Re: SH patch 2 (was Re: [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface)

[Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>]

Corinna Vinschen writes:
 > On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 10:44:05AM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
 > > On Mon, Sep 22, 2003 at 04:32:54PM +0200, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
 > > > What does that mean?  How does that affect the approval of my code
 > > > as it is now?
 > > 
 > > I can't answer the second question, but I can answer the first.
 > > 
 > > DW_OP_piece is not supported yet.  Kevin B. put together a nice little
 > > patch for a strictly limited case of DW_OP_piece triggered by the
 > > PowerPC e500 port; I don't know if this SH occurance is similar or a
 > > more general usage.
 > > 
 > > You may want to remove the bit which enables dwarf2 unwinding until
 > > this is fixed?  Just a thought.
 > 
 > I don't think that's necessary.  The results with dwarf2 unwinding are
 > 1 FAIL less than without dwarf2 unwinding.  Removing the dwarf2
 > unwinding might result in forgetting it.  Keeping it in will remind us
 > that the dwarf2 unwinder still needs a bit of work.
 > 

I think so too. But I'd like to see if something can be done for SH
similar to the i386_convert_register_p method.

elena


 > Corinna
 > 
 > -- 
 > Corinna Vinschen
 > Cygwin Developer
 > Red Hat, Inc.