From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 19963 invoked by alias); 24 Sep 2003 08:43:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 19955 invoked from network); 24 Sep 2003 08:43:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 24 Sep 2003 08:43:17 -0000 Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu-dmz.redhat.com [172.16.52.200]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8O8hF120165 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 04:43:16 -0400 Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15]) by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8O8hED10056 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 04:43:14 -0400 Received: from cygbert.vinschen.de (vpn50-8.rdu.redhat.com [172.16.50.8]) by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h8O8hDw28629 for ; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:43:13 -0700 Received: by cygbert.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 81119580A9; Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:43:11 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:43:00 -0000 From: Corinna Vinschen To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: SH patch 2 (was Re: [RFA] SH: Deprecate deprecated functions, use new frame interface) Message-ID: <20030924084311.GF9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> Reply-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20030908165510.GK1859@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16226.1322.230352.450541@localhost.redhat.com> <20030915160111.GA9283@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16231.17730.828347.741094@localhost.redhat.com> <20030916172606.GU9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030916173038.GA25459@nevyn.them.org> <20030922143254.GR9981@cygbert.vinschen.de> <20030922144405.GA20343@nevyn.them.org> <20030922150831.GA17905@cygbert.vinschen.de> <16240.44135.87461.106684@localhost.redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <16240.44135.87461.106684@localhost.redhat.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-SW-Source: 2003-09/txt/msg00521.txt.bz2 On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 04:26:15PM -0400, Elena Zannoni wrote: > Corinna Vinschen writes: > > I don't think that's necessary. The results with dwarf2 unwinding are > > 1 FAIL less than without dwarf2 unwinding. Removing the dwarf2 > > unwinding might result in forgetting it. Keeping it in will remind us > > that the dwarf2 unwinder still needs a bit of work. > > I think so too. But I'd like to see if something can be done for SH > similar to the i386_convert_register_p method. Is that necessary before the patch gets approval or could that be added in a follow up step? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Cygwin Developer Red Hat, Inc.