Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Kettenis <kettenis@chello.nl>
To: ezannoni@redhat.com
Cc: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mludvig@suse.cz, aj@suse.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH/i386newframe] amd64newframe
Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:11:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <200305191711.h4JHB4U8001198@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <16072.64004.623018.571211@localhost.redhat.com> (message from Elena Zannoni on Mon, 19 May 2003 11:36:36 -0400)

   From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@redhat.com>
   Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 11:36:36 -0400

   Mark Kettenis writes:
    > 
    > Index: ChangeLog
    > from  Mark Kettenis  <kettenis@gnu.org>
    >  
    > 	Revise the x86_64 (sub)taget.
				 ^^^^^^^
				  typo (meager contribution...:)

Lucky me!  I get another chance to correct this when I check things in
on mainline.

   I don't know if I can grant you access to some hardware, I'll see what
   I can do.  However I have tried to run the gdb testsuite.

Thanks.  

   It is not running too well, I had to kill it because it was hanging,
   like this below:

Well, at least some things work.

Hmm.  Your problems looks very similar to a problem I had on i386.
Looks like the DWARF CFI unwinder and the dummy code don't agree on
the definition of the top of a stack frame.  I checked in a patch that
implements a solution that's similar to what I did on i386 (and forgot
to move over to amd64).

Anyway, if you can spare the time to run the testsuite again...

Mark


  reply	other threads:[~2003-05-19 17:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-05-17 15:19 Mark Kettenis
2003-05-19 15:31 ` Elena Zannoni
2003-05-19 17:11   ` Mark Kettenis [this message]
2003-05-19 21:24     ` Michal Ludvig
2003-05-19 21:40       ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-05-19 22:24       ` Elena Zannoni
2003-05-17 18:34 Andreas Jaeger
2003-05-17 22:26 ` Mark Kettenis
2003-05-19  7:00   ` Michal Ludvig
2003-05-19  7:09     ` Andreas Jaeger
2003-05-19 17:15       ` Mark Kettenis
2003-05-19 19:54         ` Elena Zannoni
2003-05-19 22:31           ` Elena Zannoni
2003-05-20  5:49         ` Michal Ludvig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=200305191711.h4JHB4U8001198@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org \
    --to=kettenis@chello.nl \
    --cc=aj@suse.de \
    --cc=ezannoni@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=mludvig@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body. 
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox