From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 13123 invoked by alias); 19 May 2003 17:11:19 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 12966 invoked from network); 19 May 2003 17:11:15 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO walton.kettenis.dyndns.org) (62.163.169.212) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 19 May 2003 17:11:15 -0000 Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org [192.168.0.2]) by walton.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.5) with ESMTP id h4JHB4No000285; Mon, 19 May 2003 19:11:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: from elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.6) with ESMTP id h4JHB4h7001201; Mon, 19 May 2003 19:11:04 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from kettenis@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org) Received: (from kettenis@localhost) by elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org (8.12.6p2/8.12.6/Submit) id h4JHB4U8001198; Mon, 19 May 2003 19:11:04 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 17:11:00 -0000 Message-Id: <200305191711.h4JHB4U8001198@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> From: Mark Kettenis To: ezannoni@redhat.com CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, mludvig@suse.cz, aj@suse.de In-reply-to: <16072.64004.623018.571211@localhost.redhat.com> (message from Elena Zannoni on Mon, 19 May 2003 11:36:36 -0400) Subject: Re: [PATCH/i386newframe] amd64newframe References: <200305171519.h4HFJ5Ni045634@elgar.kettenis.dyndns.org> <16072.64004.623018.571211@localhost.redhat.com> X-SW-Source: 2003-05/txt/msg00341.txt.bz2 From: Elena Zannoni Date: Mon, 19 May 2003 11:36:36 -0400 Mark Kettenis writes: > > Index: ChangeLog > from Mark Kettenis > > Revise the x86_64 (sub)taget. ^^^^^^^ typo (meager contribution...:) Lucky me! I get another chance to correct this when I check things in on mainline. I don't know if I can grant you access to some hardware, I'll see what I can do. However I have tried to run the gdb testsuite. Thanks. It is not running too well, I had to kill it because it was hanging, like this below: Well, at least some things work. Hmm. Your problems looks very similar to a problem I had on i386. Looks like the DWARF CFI unwinder and the dummy code don't agree on the definition of the top of a stack frame. I checked in a patch that implements a solution that's similar to what I did on i386 (and forgot to move over to amd64). Anyway, if you can spare the time to run the testsuite again... Mark