Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@redhat.com>,
	"gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com" <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 02:15:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20030425002942.GB9492@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1051223376.1538.74.camel@lindt.uglyboxes.com>

On Thu, Apr 24, 2003 at 03:29:36PM -0700, Keith Seitz wrote:
> On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 15:18, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> > BTW, does ...
> > 
> > struct t
> > {
> >    int a;
> >    int b;
> > };
> > 
> > typedef struct t T;
> > 
> > main()
> > {
> >    static T v = {...};
> > }
> > 
> > tickle it?
> 
> Nope, that works properly (except for it being reported as "struct t"
> instead of "T").

[Keith, you had "test for insight/792" in your posted testsuite patch.]

There's at least one compiler bug in this area, where DWARF-2 debug info
will say struct t instead of T.  I fixed it for 3.3 and (I think?)
3.2.3.  Just in case you start getting confused :)

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer


  reply	other threads:[~2003-04-25  0:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2003-04-24 20:47 Keith Seitz
2003-04-24 20:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-24 21:51   ` Keith Seitz
2003-04-24 21:55     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-04-24 22:18       ` Keith Seitz
     [not found] ` <3EA84A9B.5020308@redhat.com>
2003-04-24 22:27   ` Keith Seitz
2003-04-24 22:31     ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-25  0:18       ` Keith Seitz
2003-04-25  2:15         ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2003-04-25  3:47           ` Andrew Cagney
2003-04-25  5:32             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-11 20:07       ` Keith Seitz
2003-06-11 21:01         ` Andrew Cagney
2003-06-11 23:51         ` David Carlton
2003-06-12  0:28           ` Keith Seitz
2003-06-12  1:28             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-19 19:28               ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-19 19:53                 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-19 20:33                   ` Keith Seitz
2003-06-19 20:43                     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2003-06-19 21:30                       ` Keith Seitz

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20030425002942.GB9492@nevyn.them.org \
    --to=drow@mvista.com \
    --cc=ac131313@redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    --cc=keiths@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox