Re: [RFA] varobj: call CHECK_TYPEDEF

[Keith Seitz <keiths@redhat.com>]

On Thu, 2003-04-24 at 15:18, Andrew Cagney wrote:

So where do we stand with this? Shall I check it in and deal with the
fallout? (I need to go through and double-check all the typedef stuff in
varobj anyway, but at least this will allow users to use varobj, even if
it isn't cosmetically perfect.)

Keith

> > Index: insight219-b.cc
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: insight219-b.cc
> > diff -N insight219-b.cc
> > --- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> > +++ insight219-b.cc	24 Apr 2003 21:54:00 -0000
> > @@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
> > +#include "insight219.h"
> > +
> > +B::~B() {}
> > +
> 
> 
> > Index: insight219.cc
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: insight219.cc
> > diff -N insight219.cc
> > --- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> > +++ insight219.cc	24 Apr 2003 21:54:00 -0000
> > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> > +#include "insight219.h"
> > +
> > +int
> > +main(int argc, char *argv[])
> > +{
> > +  B *b = new B();
> > +  return 0;
> > +};
> > Index: insight219.h
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: insight219.h
> > diff -N insight219.h
> > --- /dev/null	1 Jan 1970 00:00:00 -0000
> > +++ insight219.h	24 Apr 2003 21:54:00 -0000
> > @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> > +class B
> > +{
> > +public:
> > +    virtual ~B();
> > +
> > +private:
> > +    int b;
> > +};
> 
>