Re: [rfa] update config/djgpp/fnchange.lst with recent gdb.c++ files

Re: [rfa] update config/djgpp/fnchange.lst with recent gdb.c++ files

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

Committed.

Michael C

2003-01-09  Michael Chastain  <mec@shout.net>

	* config/djgpp/fnchange.lst: update file list for testsuite/gdb.c++.

Re: [rfa] update config/djgpp/fnchange.lst with recent gdb.c++ files

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

Eli Z writes:
> Changes to fnchange.lst that add files in gdb.c++ are indeed obvious.

OK thanks.  As gdb.c++ maintainer I will make sure that fnchange.lst
gets all the new files.

> Since the ARI script processes fnchange.lst before it runs doschk and
> reports file names that are invalid on DOS 8+3 filesystems, I think
> just rerunning ARI should be a sufficient test.  Andrew, is that true?

I can't find the source code for ARI.  I suspect that it's in the
gdbadmin module but I ran into a CVS error when I tried to check it out.
(I reported a PR on that).

Michael C

[rfa] update config/djgpp/fnchange.lst with recent gdb.c++ files

[Michael Elizabeth Chastain]

This patch updates config/djgpp/fnchange.lst with files that have
recently been added to testsuite/gdb.c++.  It seems obvious to me,
but fnchange.lst is new to me.

EVERY file in testsuite/gdb.c++ must be registered in fnchange.lst!
I'm going to propose a fix for that.  But I want to get this patch
approved (or rejected) first and then raise that issue.

Testing: I haven't tested this (I don't know how).

Okay to apply?

Michael C

2003-01-09  Michael Chastain  <mec@shout.net>

	* config/djgpp/fnchange.lst: update file list for testsuite/gdb.c++.

Index: config/djgpp/fnchange.lst
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/config/djgpp/fnchange.lst,v
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -r1.40 fnchange.lst
--- config/djgpp/fnchange.lst	12 Nov 2002 16:30:08 -0000	1.40
+++ config/djgpp/fnchange.lst	9 Jan 2003 21:38:09 -0000
@@ -198,6 +198,8 @@
 @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/annota2.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/annota2.exp
 @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/anon-union.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/anon-union.cc
 @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/anon-union.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/anon-union.exp
+@V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/casts.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/casts.cc
+@V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/casts.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/casts.exp
 @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/classes.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/classes.exp
 @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/configure @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/configure
 @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/configure.in @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/configure.in
@@ -239,6 +241,13 @@
 @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/overload.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/overload.exp
 @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/ovldbreak.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/ovldbreak.cc
 @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/ovldbreak.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/ovldbreak.exp
+@V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/pr-574.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/pr-574.cc
+@V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/pr-574.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/pr-574.exp
+@V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/printmethod.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/printmethod.cc
+@V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/printmethod.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/printmethod.exp
+@V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/psmang.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/psmang.exp
+@V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/psmang1.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/psmang1.cc
+@V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/psmang2.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/psmang2.cc
 @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/ref-types.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/ref-types.cc
 @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/ref-types.exp @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/ref-types.exp
 @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.c++/templates.cc @V@/gdb/testsuite/gdb.cxx/templates.cc

Re: [rfa] update config/djgpp/fnchange.lst with recent gdb.c++ files

[Eli Zaretskii]

> Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:52:14 -0600
> From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net>
> 
> This patch updates config/djgpp/fnchange.lst with files that have
> recently been added to testsuite/gdb.c++.  It seems obvious to me,
> but fnchange.lst is new to me.

Changes to fnchange.lst that add files in gdb.c++ are indeed obvious.

> EVERY file in testsuite/gdb.c++ must be registered in fnchange.lst!

Yes.

> Testing: I haven't tested this (I don't know how).

Since the ARI script processes fnchange.lst before it runs doschk and
reports file names that are invalid on DOS 8+3 filesystems, I think
just rerunning ARI should be a sufficient test.  Andrew, is that true?

> Okay to apply?

Yes, please.

Thanks.