From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Received: (qmail 12186 invoked from network); 10 Jan 2003 20:44:41 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO odin.inter.net.il) (192.114.186.10) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 10 Jan 2003 20:44:41 -0000 Received: from zaretsky ([80.230.85.156]) by odin.inter.net.il (Mirapoint Messaging Server MOS 3.2.1-GA) with ESMTP id AWZ32423; Fri, 10 Jan 2003 22:44:20 +0200 (IST) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:44:00 -0000 From: "Eli Zaretskii" To: mec@shout.net Message-Id: <7704-Fri10Jan2003224122+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> CC: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com In-reply-to: <200301092152.h09LqEE08138@duracef.shout.net> (message from Michael Elizabeth Chastain on Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:52:14 -0600) Subject: Re: [rfa] update config/djgpp/fnchange.lst with recent gdb.c++ files Reply-to: Eli Zaretskii References: <200301092152.h09LqEE08138@duracef.shout.net> X-SW-Source: 2003-01/txt/msg00414.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2003 15:52:14 -0600 > From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain > > This patch updates config/djgpp/fnchange.lst with files that have > recently been added to testsuite/gdb.c++. It seems obvious to me, > but fnchange.lst is new to me. Changes to fnchange.lst that add files in gdb.c++ are indeed obvious. > EVERY file in testsuite/gdb.c++ must be registered in fnchange.lst! Yes. > Testing: I haven't tested this (I don't know how). Since the ARI script processes fnchange.lst before it runs doschk and reports file names that are invalid on DOS 8+3 filesystems, I think just rerunning ARI should be a sufficient test. Andrew, is that true? > Okay to apply? Yes, please. Thanks.