From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: david carlton <carlton@math.stanford.edu>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>,
Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: RFA: >, >>, and "tee" operators
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2002 09:39:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20020731163628.GA5436@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <15688.4371.193070.843000@jackfruit.Stanford.EDU>
On Wed, Jul 31, 2002 at 09:32:19AM -0700, david carlton wrote:
> So I think that, if this syntax is changed, the fact that expressions
> could start with unary minus signs is going to cause much less
> grumbling from users than the fact that, once the old p/x syntax gets
> obsoleted, they'll have to convert over to typing p -x instead.
Which, for the record, I never suggested - I think p/x and log -a are
different enough uses of options that they can still both exist without
any real inconsistency.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-07-31 16:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-23 11:51 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-23 12:23 ` Tom Tromey
2002-07-23 13:18 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-23 13:20 ` Tom Tromey
2002-07-23 13:58 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-24 20:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-24 20:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-25 9:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-25 10:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-25 10:46 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-30 13:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-30 20:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-30 20:51 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-30 20:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-30 22:45 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-07-31 9:36 ` david carlton
2002-07-31 9:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2002-08-01 8:05 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-01 10:24 ` david carlton
2002-08-01 12:03 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-01 12:16 ` david carlton
2002-08-13 15:20 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-07-23 14:23 ` Grant Edwards
2002-07-24 1:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2002-07-24 19:01 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-07-24 22:15 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20020731163628.GA5436@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
--cc=carlton@math.stanford.edu \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=tromey@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox