Re: S390[x] configuration update

[Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>]

On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 02:03:00PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote:
> 
> >>Yes, definitly closed.
> >>
> >>I also suspect there is no benefit in pulling it into the 5.2 branch 
> >>once unfrozen.  The existing stuff ``works'' - as they say, if it ain't 
> >>broke don't fix it :-)
> >
> >
> >By ``works'' you mean doesn't build? :)  See above; 5.2 won't build on
> >S/390.
> 
> My understanding of Andreas's original post is that it updated things to 
> current wisdom rather than fixed a pre-existing build problem.
> 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-04/msg01104.html

Different interpretation of his phrasing, perhaps.  But no GNU/Linux
target that uses config/nm-linux.h can link without including
linux-proc.o; I assume it was missed because the .mh file is named
s390.mh instead of s390/linux.mh.  S/390 doesn't build in 5.2 without
this patch.

-- 
Daniel Jacobowitz                           Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software                         Debian GNU/Linux Developer