Re: S390[x] configuration update

[Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>]

> Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com> writes:
> 
> |> >> Yes, definitly closed.
> |> >> I also suspect there is no benefit in pulling it into the 5.2 branch
> |> >> once unfrozen.  The existing stuff ``works'' - as they say, if it ain't
> |> >> broke don't fix it :-)
> |> > By ``works'' you mean doesn't build? :)  See above; 5.2 won't build on
> |> > S/390.
> |> 
> |> My understanding of Andreas's original post is that it updated things to
> |> current wisdom rather than fixed a pre-existing build problem.
> 
> Sloppy phrasing, sorry.  The current wisdom includes that linux-proc.o has
> to be linked in.

Ah, ok, as the branch is unfrozen, it can go in (per daniel's suggestion).

Andrew