From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 8452 invoked by alias); 29 Apr 2002 19:06:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 7965 invoked from network); 29 Apr 2002 19:05:29 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO nevyn.them.org) (128.2.145.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 29 Apr 2002 19:05:29 -0000 Received: from drow by nevyn.them.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 172GSn-00018S-00 for ; Mon, 29 Apr 2002 15:05:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2002 12:06:00 -0000 From: Daniel Jacobowitz To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: S390[x] configuration update Message-ID: <20020429150529.A4276@nevyn.them.org> Mail-Followup-To: gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com References: <20020427192408.A6259@nevyn.them.org> <20020427202525.A8877@nevyn.them.org> <20020427203648.A9559@nevyn.them.org> <3CCD7260.8050207@cygnus.com> <20020429123114.A3501@nevyn.them.org> <3CCD8AD4.2070807@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3CCD8AD4.2070807@cygnus.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.23i X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg01135.txt.bz2 On Mon, Apr 29, 2002 at 02:03:00PM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > >>Yes, definitly closed. > >> > >>I also suspect there is no benefit in pulling it into the 5.2 branch > >>once unfrozen. The existing stuff ``works'' - as they say, if it ain't > >>broke don't fix it :-) > > > > > >By ``works'' you mean doesn't build? :) See above; 5.2 won't build on > >S/390. > > My understanding of Andreas's original post is that it updated things to > current wisdom rather than fixed a pre-existing build problem. > > http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/2002-04/msg01104.html Different interpretation of his phrasing, perhaps. But no GNU/Linux target that uses config/nm-linux.h can link without including linux-proc.o; I assume it was missed because the .mh file is named s390.mh instead of s390/linux.mh. S/390 doesn't build in 5.2 without this patch. -- Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer