* [PATCH] Add ABI variant infrastructure to Alpha target
@ 2002-04-21 11:24 Jason R Thorpe
2002-04-21 12:06 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-21 17:19 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jason R Thorpe @ 2002-04-21 11:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 519 bytes --]
Cloned from arm-tdep.c, committed per the mult-arch rule.
* alpha-tdep.c (alpha_abi_handler): New structure to describe
an Alpha ABI variant.
(alpha_abi_handler_list): Declare.
(alpha_gdbarch_register_os_abi): New function.
(alpha_gdbarch_init): Give registered ABI variant handlers a
chance to tweak the gdbarch once we have set up defaults.
* alpha-tdep.h: Prototype alpha_gdbarch_register_os_abi.
--
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
[-- Attachment #2: alpha-patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 3662 bytes --]
Index: alpha-tdep.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/alpha-tdep.c,v
retrieving revision 1.23
diff -u -r1.23 alpha-tdep.c
--- alpha-tdep.c 21 Apr 2002 17:54:49 -0000 1.23
+++ alpha-tdep.c 21 Apr 2002 18:16:42 -0000
@@ -1902,6 +1902,44 @@
return ALPHA_ABI_UNKNOWN;
}
+struct alpha_abi_handler
+{
+ struct alpha_abi_handler *next;
+ enum alpha_abi abi;
+ void (*init_abi)(struct gdbarch_info, struct gdbarch *);
+};
+
+struct alpha_abi_handler *alpha_abi_handler_list = NULL;
+
+void
+alpha_gdbarch_register_os_abi (enum alpha_abi abi,
+ void (*init_abi)(struct gdbarch_info,
+ struct gdbarch *))
+{
+ struct alpha_abi_handler **handler_p;
+
+ for (handler_p = &alpha_abi_handler_list; *handler_p != NULL;
+ handler_p = &(*handler_p)->next)
+ {
+ if ((*handler_p)->abi == abi)
+ {
+ internal_error
+ (__FILE__, __LINE__,
+ "alpha_gdbarch_register_os_abi: A handler for this ABI variant "
+ "(%d) has already been registered", (int) abi);
+ /* If user wants to continue, override previous definition. */
+ (*handler_p)->init_abi = init_abi;
+ return;
+ }
+ }
+
+ (*handler_p)
+ = (struct alpha_abi_handler *) xmalloc (sizeof (struct alpha_abi_handler));
+ (*handler_p)->next = NULL;
+ (*handler_p)->abi = abi;
+ (*handler_p)->init_abi = init_abi;
+}
+
/* Initialize the current architecture based on INFO. If possible, re-use an
architecture from ARCHES, which is a list of architectures already created
during this debugging session.
@@ -1915,6 +1953,7 @@
struct gdbarch_tdep *tdep;
struct gdbarch *gdbarch;
enum alpha_abi alpha_abi = ALPHA_ABI_UNKNOWN;
+ struct alpha_abi_handler *abi_handler;
/* Try to determine the ABI of the object we are loading. */
@@ -2064,6 +2103,40 @@
set_gdbarch_decr_pc_after_break (gdbarch, 4);
set_gdbarch_frame_args_skip (gdbarch, 0);
+
+ /* Hook in ABI-specific overrides, if they have been registered. */
+ if (alpha_abi == ALPHA_ABI_UNKNOWN)
+ {
+ /* Don't complain about not knowing the ABI variant if we don't
+ have an inferior. */
+ if (info.abfd)
+ fprintf_filtered
+ (gdb_stderr, "GDB doesn't recognize the ABI of the inferior. "
+ "Attempting to continue with the default Alpha settings");
+ }
+ else
+ {
+ for (abi_handler = alpha_abi_handler_list; abi_handler != NULL;
+ abi_handler = abi_handler->next)
+ if (abi_handler->abi == alpha_abi)
+ break;
+
+ if (abi_handler)
+ abi_handler->init_abi (info, gdbarch);
+ else
+ {
+ /* We assume that if GDB_MULTI_ARCH is less than
+ GDB_MULTI_ARCH_TM that an ABI variant can be supported by
+ overriding definitions in this file. */
+ if (GDB_MULTI_ARCH > GDB_MULTI_ARCH_PARTIAL)
+ fprintf_filtered
+ (gdb_stderr,
+ "A handler for the ABI variant \"%s\" is not built into this "
+ "configuration of GDB. "
+ "Attempting to continue with the default Alpha settings",
+ alpha_abi_names[alpha_abi]);
+ }
+ }
return gdbarch;
}
Index: alpha-tdep.h
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/alpha-tdep.h,v
retrieving revision 1.2
diff -u -r1.2 alpha-tdep.h
--- alpha-tdep.h 21 Apr 2002 17:30:07 -0000 1.2
+++ alpha-tdep.h 21 Apr 2002 18:16:43 -0000
@@ -98,4 +98,8 @@
CORE_ADDR vm_min_address; /* used by heuristic_proc_start */
};
+void alpha_gdbarch_register_os_abi (enum alpha_abi,
+ void (*init_abi)(struct gdbarch_info,
+ struct gdbarch *));
+
#endif /* ALPHA_TDEP_H */
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add ABI variant infrastructure to Alpha target
2002-04-21 11:24 [PATCH] Add ABI variant infrastructure to Alpha target Jason R Thorpe
@ 2002-04-21 12:06 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-21 17:19 ` David S. Miller
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-04-21 12:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thorpej; +Cc: gdb-patches
> Cloned from arm-tdep.c, committed per the mult-arch rule.
>
> * alpha-tdep.c (alpha_abi_handler): New structure to describe
> an Alpha ABI variant.
> (alpha_abi_handler_list): Declare.
> (alpha_gdbarch_register_os_abi): New function.
> (alpha_gdbarch_init): Give registered ABI variant handlers a
> chance to tweak the gdbarch once we have set up defaults.
> * alpha-tdep.h: Prototype alpha_gdbarch_register_os_abi.
>
Hmm,
It might be time to think about pushing this upstream into gdbarch.[shc].
Want to create a bug report for the task?
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add ABI variant infrastructure to Alpha target
2002-04-21 11:24 [PATCH] Add ABI variant infrastructure to Alpha target Jason R Thorpe
2002-04-21 12:06 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-04-21 17:19 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-21 17:57 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-04-21 17:59 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 2 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2002-04-21 17:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: thorpej; +Cc: gdb-patches
From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:24:18 -0700
Cloned from arm-tdep.c, committed per the mult-arch rule.
What is the multi-arch rule? Do my sparc OS ABI changes fall under
it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add ABI variant infrastructure to Alpha target
2002-04-21 17:19 ` David S. Miller
@ 2002-04-21 17:57 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-04-21 17:59 ` Andrew Cagney
1 sibling, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Jason R Thorpe @ 2002-04-21 17:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: gdb-patches
On Sun, Apr 21, 2002 at 05:10:29PM -0700, David S. Miller wrote:
> What is the multi-arch rule? Do my sparc OS ABI changes fall under
> it?
From the various discussions on the mailing lists, I understand the
rule to be:
Mechanical changes needed to multi-arch a target are
considered obvious.
--
-- Jason R. Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add ABI variant infrastructure to Alpha target
2002-04-21 17:19 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-21 17:57 ` Jason R Thorpe
@ 2002-04-21 17:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-21 18:02 ` David S. Miller
1 sibling, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-04-21 17:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: thorpej, gdb-patches
> From: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 11:24:18 -0700
>
> Cloned from arm-tdep.c, committed per the mult-arch rule.
>
> What is the multi-arch rule?
It is the ``obvious fix rule'' interpreted liberally in the multi-arch
context. A multi-arch conversion is largely slog work, consisting of a
sequence of mechanical (but separate) changes.
http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/papers/multi-arch/howto.html
> Do my sparc OS ABI changes fall under
> it?
I'd tend to suspect that the other SPARC developers are going to take
the oportunity to review that proposal.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add ABI variant infrastructure to Alpha target
2002-04-21 17:59 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-04-21 18:02 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-21 19:49 ` Andrew Cagney
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2002-04-21 18:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313; +Cc: thorpej, gdb-patches
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 20:59:16 -0400
> Do my sparc OS ABI changes fall under
> it?
I'd tend to suspect that the other SPARC developers are going to take
the oportunity to review that proposal.
Oh crap, based upon Jason's explanation of the multi-arch rule I just
checked in the Sparc OS abi changes....
Do I need to revert them now?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add ABI variant infrastructure to Alpha target
2002-04-21 18:02 ` David S. Miller
@ 2002-04-21 19:49 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-21 20:51 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-04-21 19:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: David S. Miller; +Cc: thorpej, gdb-patches
> From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
> Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 20:59:16 -0400
>
> > Do my sparc OS ABI changes fall under
> > it?
>
> I'd tend to suspect that the other SPARC developers are going to take
> the oportunity to review that proposal.
>
> Oh crap, based upon Jason's explanation of the multi-arch rule I just
> checked in the Sparc OS abi changes....
> Do I need to revert them now?
Yes.
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH] Add ABI variant infrastructure to Alpha target
2002-04-21 19:49 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-04-21 20:51 ` David S. Miller
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: David S. Miller @ 2002-04-21 20:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: ac131313; +Cc: thorpej, gdb-patches
From: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@cygnus.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 22:49:36 -0400
> Do I need to revert them now?
Yes.
Sigh, done...
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-04-22 3:51 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-04-21 11:24 [PATCH] Add ABI variant infrastructure to Alpha target Jason R Thorpe
2002-04-21 12:06 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-21 17:19 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-21 17:57 ` Jason R Thorpe
2002-04-21 17:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-21 18:02 ` David S. Miller
2002-04-21 19:49 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-04-21 20:51 ` David S. Miller
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox