From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10841 invoked by alias); 22 Apr 2002 01:02:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Subscribe: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10834 invoked from network); 22 Apr 2002 01:02:44 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO pizda.ninka.net) (216.101.162.242) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 22 Apr 2002 01:02:44 -0000 Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA02129; Sun, 21 Apr 2002 17:53:40 -0700 Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 18:02:00 -0000 Message-Id: <20020421.175339.46652612.davem@redhat.com> To: ac131313@cygnus.com Cc: thorpej@wasabisystems.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add ABI variant infrastructure to Alpha target From: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <3CC36064.4010201@cygnus.com> References: <20020421112418.H1627@dr-evil.shagadelic.org> <20020421.171029.98615711.davem@redhat.com> <3CC36064.4010201@cygnus.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-SW-Source: 2002-04/txt/msg00757.txt.bz2 From: Andrew Cagney Date: Sun, 21 Apr 2002 20:59:16 -0400 > Do my sparc OS ABI changes fall under > it? I'd tend to suspect that the other SPARC developers are going to take the oportunity to review that proposal. Oh crap, based upon Jason's explanation of the multi-arch rule I just checked in the Sparc OS abi changes.... Do I need to revert them now?