* [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp
@ 2002-01-09 16:05 Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-09 16:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-29 21:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-01-09 16:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
From the "annoying testsuite failures cleanup" department - if anyone has a
bright idea on how to write annota tests in a more readable, less
long-single-line fashion, I'd love to hear it. This fixes the test on all
my compiler/debug combinations, i386-linux. OK to commit?
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
2002-01-09 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
* gdb.base/annota1.exp (backtrace from shlibrary): Fix spelling.
Allow a start function above main.
Index: annota1.exp
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp,v
retrieving revision 1.7
diff -u -p -r1.7 annota1.exp
--- annota1.exp 2001/12/20 16:52:07 1.7
+++ annota1.exp 2002/01/09 23:53:35
@@ -247,8 +247,8 @@ gdb_expect {
#
send_gdb "backtrace\n"
gdb_expect {
- -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 0 $hex\r\n.0 \r\n(\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n)*\032\032frame-function-name\r\nprintf\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(.*frame-end\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 1 $hex\r\n.1 \r\n\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n\032\032frame-function-name\r\nmain\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(\\)\r\n\032\032frame-source-begin\r\n at \r\n\032\032frame-source-file\r\n${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}\r\n\032\032frame-source-file-end\r\n:\r\n\032\032frame-source-line\r\n.*\r\n\032\032frame-source-end\r\n\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n$gdb_prompt$" \
- { pass "bactrace from shlibrary" }
+ -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 0 $hex\r\n.0 \r\n(\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n)*\032\032frame-function-name\r\nprintf\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(.*frame-end\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 1 $hex\r\n.1 \r\n\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n\032\032frame-function-name\r\nmain\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(\\)\r\n\032\032frame-source-begin\r\n at \r\n\032\032frame-source-file\r\n${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}\r\n\032\032frame-source-file-end\r\n:\r\n\032\032frame-source-line\r\n.*\r\n\032\032frame-source-end\r\n\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n(\r\n\032\032frame-begin .*\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n)*$gdb_prompt$" \
+ { pass "backtrace from shlibrary" }
-re ".*$gdb_prompt$" { fail "backtrace from shlibrary" }
timeout { fail "backtrace from shlibrary (timeout)" }
}
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp
2002-01-09 16:05 [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-01-09 16:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-29 21:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Andrew Cagney @ 2002-01-09 16:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb-patches
>>From the "annoying testsuite failures cleanup" department - if anyone has a
> bright idea on how to write annota tests in a more readable, less
> long-single-line fashion, I'd love to hear it. This fixes the test on all
> my compiler/debug combinations, i386-linux. OK to commit?
>
Have a look at gdb_expect_list().
Andrew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp
2002-01-09 16:05 [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-09 16:41 ` Andrew Cagney
@ 2002-01-29 21:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-29 22:59 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-02-09 8:19 ` Jim Blandy
1 sibling, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-01-29 21:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:06:28PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >From the "annoying testsuite failures cleanup" department - if anyone has a
> bright idea on how to write annota tests in a more readable, less
> long-single-line fashion, I'd love to hear it. This fixes the test on all
> my compiler/debug combinations, i386-linux. OK to commit?
Anyone?
> 2002-01-09 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
>
> * gdb.base/annota1.exp (backtrace from shlibrary): Fix spelling.
> Allow a start function above main.
>
> Index: annota1.exp
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp,v
> retrieving revision 1.7
> diff -u -p -r1.7 annota1.exp
> --- annota1.exp 2001/12/20 16:52:07 1.7
> +++ annota1.exp 2002/01/09 23:53:35
> @@ -247,8 +247,8 @@ gdb_expect {
> #
> send_gdb "backtrace\n"
> gdb_expect {
> - -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 0 $hex\r\n.0 \r\n(\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n)*\032\032frame-function-name\r\nprintf\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(.*frame-end\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 1 $hex\r\n.1 \r\n\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n\032\032frame-function-name\r\nmain\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(\\)\r\n\032\032frame-source-begin\r\n at \r\n\032\032frame-source-file\r\n${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}\r\n\032\032frame-source-file-end\r\n:\r\n\032\032frame-source-line\r\n.*\r\n\032\032frame-source-end\r\n\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n$gdb_prompt$" \
> - { pass "bactrace from shlibrary" }
> + -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 0 $hex\r\n.0 \r\n(\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n)*\032\032frame-function-name\r\nprintf\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(.*frame-end\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 1 $hex\r\n.1 \r\n\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n\032\032frame-function-name\r\nmain\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(\\)\r\n\032\032frame-source-begin\r\n at \r\n\032\032frame-source-file\r\n${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}\r\n\032\032frame-source-file-end\r\n:\r\n\032\032frame-source-line\r\n.*\r\n\032\032frame-source-end\r\n\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n(\r\n\032\032frame-begin .*\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n)*$gdb_prompt$" \
> + { pass "backtrace from shlibrary" }
> -re ".*$gdb_prompt$" { fail "backtrace from shlibrary" }
> timeout { fail "backtrace from shlibrary (timeout)" }
> }
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp
2002-01-29 21:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
@ 2002-01-29 22:59 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-01-30 7:01 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-02-09 8:19 ` Jim Blandy
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Kevin Buettner @ 2002-01-29 22:59 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz, gdb-patches
On Jan 30, 12:57am, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:06:28PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > >From the "annoying testsuite failures cleanup" department - if anyone has a
> > bright idea on how to write annota tests in a more readable, less
> > long-single-line fashion, I'd love to hear it. This fixes the test on all
> > my compiler/debug combinations, i386-linux. OK to commit?
>
> Anyone?
I think it's fine. But Fernando's the maintainer, so it's his call...
Kevin
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp
2002-01-29 22:59 ` Kevin Buettner
@ 2002-01-30 7:01 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-01-30 21:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Nasser @ 2002-01-30 7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Kevin Buettner; +Cc: Daniel Jacobowitz, gdb-patches
Kevin Buettner wrote:
>
> On Jan 30, 12:57am, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:06:28PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > >From the "annoying testsuite failures cleanup" department - if anyone has a
> > > bright idea on how to write annota tests in a more readable, less
> > > long-single-line fashion, I'd love to hear it. This fixes the test on all
> > > my compiler/debug combinations, i386-linux. OK to commit?
> >
> > Anyone?
>
> I think it's fine. But Fernando's the maintainer, so it's his call...
>
> Kevin
Nobody has any objections, so please check it in.
And thanks for the fix.
Regards,
Fernando
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp
2002-01-30 7:01 ` Fernando Nasser
@ 2002-01-30 21:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-01-30 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: gdb-patches
On Wed, Jan 30, 2002 at 10:00:48AM -0500, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> Kevin Buettner wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 30, 12:57am, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:06:28PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > > >From the "annoying testsuite failures cleanup" department - if anyone has a
> > > > bright idea on how to write annota tests in a more readable, less
> > > > long-single-line fashion, I'd love to hear it. This fixes the test on all
> > > > my compiler/debug combinations, i386-linux. OK to commit?
> > >
> > > Anyone?
> >
> > I think it's fine. But Fernando's the maintainer, so it's his call...
> >
> > Kevin
>
> Nobody has any objections, so please check it in.
>
> And thanks for the fix.
Committed, thanks.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp
2002-01-29 21:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-29 22:59 ` Kevin Buettner
@ 2002-02-09 8:19 ` Jim Blandy
2002-02-09 14:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jim Blandy @ 2002-02-09 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Daniel Jacobowitz; +Cc: gdb-patches
If you apply my FRAME_CHAIN_VALID patch, doesn't that simply eliminate
these failures altogether, since __libc_start_main doesn't appear in
the backtrace?
Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:06:28PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > >From the "annoying testsuite failures cleanup" department - if anyone has a
> > bright idea on how to write annota tests in a more readable, less
> > long-single-line fashion, I'd love to hear it. This fixes the test on all
> > my compiler/debug combinations, i386-linux. OK to commit?
>
> Anyone?
>
> > 2002-01-09 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> >
> > * gdb.base/annota1.exp (backtrace from shlibrary): Fix spelling.
> > Allow a start function above main.
> >
> > Index: annota1.exp
> > ===================================================================
> > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp,v
> > retrieving revision 1.7
> > diff -u -p -r1.7 annota1.exp
> > --- annota1.exp 2001/12/20 16:52:07 1.7
> > +++ annota1.exp 2002/01/09 23:53:35
> > @@ -247,8 +247,8 @@ gdb_expect {
> > #
> > send_gdb "backtrace\n"
> > gdb_expect {
> > - -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 0 $hex\r\n.0 \r\n(\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n)*\032\032frame-function-name\r\nprintf\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(.*frame-end\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 1 $hex\r\n.1 \r\n\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n\032\032frame-function-name\r\nmain\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(\\)\r\n\032\032frame-source-begin\r\n at \r\n\032\032frame-source-file\r\n${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}\r\n\032\032frame-source-file-end\r\n:\r\n\032\032frame-source-line\r\n.*\r\n\032\032frame-source-end\r\n\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n$gdb_prompt$" \
> > - { pass "bactrace from shlibrary" }
> > + -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 0 $hex\r\n.0 \r\n(\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n)*\032\032frame-function-name\r\nprintf\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(.*frame-end\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 1 $hex\r\n.1 \r\n\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n\032\032frame-function-name\r\nmain\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(\\)\r\n\032\032frame-source-begin\r\n at \r\n\032\032frame-source-file\r\n${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}\r\n\032\032frame-source-file-end\r\n:\r\n\032\032frame-source-line\r\n.*\r\n\032\032frame-source-end\r\n\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n(\r\n\032\032frame-begin .*\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n)*$gdb_prompt$" \
> > + { pass "backtrace from shlibrary" }
> > -re ".*$gdb_prompt$" { fail "backtrace from shlibrary" }
> > timeout { fail "backtrace from shlibrary (timeout)" }
> > }
> >
>
> --
> Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
> MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp
2002-02-09 8:19 ` Jim Blandy
@ 2002-02-09 14:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Daniel Jacobowitz @ 2002-02-09 14:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jim Blandy; +Cc: gdb-patches
I assume so. But that patch went in, and I'd rather leave it in at
least until we have a policy about what not to display that goes across
all targets.
On Sat, Feb 09, 2002 at 11:21:24AM -0500, Jim Blandy wrote:
>
> If you apply my FRAME_CHAIN_VALID patch, doesn't that simply eliminate
> these failures altogether, since __libc_start_main doesn't appear in
> the backtrace?
>
> Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com> writes:
>
> > On Wed, Jan 09, 2002 at 07:06:28PM -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> > > >From the "annoying testsuite failures cleanup" department - if anyone has a
> > > bright idea on how to write annota tests in a more readable, less
> > > long-single-line fashion, I'd love to hear it. This fixes the test on all
> > > my compiler/debug combinations, i386-linux. OK to commit?
> >
> > Anyone?
> >
> > > 2002-01-09 Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
> > >
> > > * gdb.base/annota1.exp (backtrace from shlibrary): Fix spelling.
> > > Allow a start function above main.
> > >
> > > Index: annota1.exp
> > > ===================================================================
> > > RCS file: /cvs/src/src/gdb/testsuite/gdb.base/annota1.exp,v
> > > retrieving revision 1.7
> > > diff -u -p -r1.7 annota1.exp
> > > --- annota1.exp 2001/12/20 16:52:07 1.7
> > > +++ annota1.exp 2002/01/09 23:53:35
> > > @@ -247,8 +247,8 @@ gdb_expect {
> > > #
> > > send_gdb "backtrace\n"
> > > gdb_expect {
> > > - -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 0 $hex\r\n.0 \r\n(\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n)*\032\032frame-function-name\r\nprintf\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(.*frame-end\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 1 $hex\r\n.1 \r\n\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n\032\032frame-function-name\r\nmain\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(\\)\r\n\032\032frame-source-begin\r\n at \r\n\032\032frame-source-file\r\n${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}\r\n\032\032frame-source-file-end\r\n:\r\n\032\032frame-source-line\r\n.*\r\n\032\032frame-source-end\r\n\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n$gdb_prompt$" \
> > > - { pass "bactrace from shlibrary" }
> > > + -re "\r\n\032\032post-prompt\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 0 $hex\r\n.0 \r\n(\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n)*\032\032frame-function-name\r\nprintf\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(.*frame-end\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-begin 1 $hex\r\n.1 \r\n\032\032frame-address\r\n$hex\r\n\032\032frame-address-end\r\n in \r\n\032\032frame-function-name\r\nmain\r\n\032\032frame-args\r\n \\(\\)\r\n\032\032frame-source-begin\r\n at \r\n\032\032frame-source-file\r\n${srcdir}/${subdir}/${srcfile}\r\n\032\032frame-source-file-end\r\n:\r\n\032\032frame-source-line\r\n.*\r\n\032\032frame-source-end\r\n\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n(\r\n\032\032frame-begin .*\r\n\r\n\032\032frame-end\r\n)*$gdb_prompt$" \
> > > + { pass "backtrace from shlibrary" }
> > > -re ".*$gdb_prompt$" { fail "backtrace from shlibrary" }
> > > timeout { fail "backtrace from shlibrary (timeout)" }
> > > }
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
> > MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
>
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp
2002-01-30 8:37 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-02-09 8:18 ` Jim Blandy
@ 2002-02-09 8:19 ` Jim Blandy
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jim Blandy @ 2002-02-09 8:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fernando Nasser; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, drow, gdb-patches
You know, it wouldn't be hard to write another mi-like interface that
used different builders to emit Emacs Lisp s-expressions. We could
end up with a real killer Emacs interface that way.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp
2002-01-30 8:37 ` Fernando Nasser
@ 2002-02-09 8:18 ` Jim Blandy
2002-02-09 8:19 ` Jim Blandy
1 sibling, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Jim Blandy @ 2002-02-09 8:18 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Fernando Nasser; +Cc: Michael Elizabeth Chastain, drow, gdb-patches
Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com> writes:
> Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
> >
> > BTW, the annotation interface is deprecated (see the NEWS file
> > in gdb 5.1.1). I'm in favor of maintaining test scripts for
> > deprecated features for a while, but I don't feel an urge to
> > solve the "giant annotation line" problem.
> >
> > Andrew or anyone, can you say how long the annotation interface
> > is going to stay around?
> >
>
> I believe as long as emacs uses it.
M-x gdb doesn't use it. There's no way to know whether anyone's using
the other interface; it could just lie around for years.
I think we should #ifdef out support for the annotation interface, and
see if anyone complains.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp
2002-01-30 8:02 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
@ 2002-01-30 8:37 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-02-09 8:18 ` Jim Blandy
2002-02-09 8:19 ` Jim Blandy
0 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Fernando Nasser @ 2002-01-30 8:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Michael Elizabeth Chastain; +Cc: drow, gdb-patches
Michael Elizabeth Chastain wrote:
>
> BTW, the annotation interface is deprecated (see the NEWS file
> in gdb 5.1.1). I'm in favor of maintaining test scripts for
> deprecated features for a while, but I don't feel an urge to
> solve the "giant annotation line" problem.
>
> Andrew or anyone, can you say how long the annotation interface
> is going to stay around?
>
I believe as long as emacs uses it.
--
Fernando Nasser
Red Hat Canada Ltd. E-Mail: fnasser@redhat.com
2323 Yonge Street, Suite #300
Toronto, Ontario M4P 2C9
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp
@ 2002-01-30 8:02 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-01-30 8:37 ` Fernando Nasser
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Michael Elizabeth Chastain @ 2002-01-30 8:02 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: drow, gdb-patches
BTW, the annotation interface is deprecated (see the NEWS file
in gdb 5.1.1). I'm in favor of maintaining test scripts for
deprecated features for a while, but I don't feel an urge to
solve the "giant annotation line" problem.
Andrew or anyone, can you say how long the annotation interface
is going to stay around?
Michael C
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2002-02-09 22:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-01-09 16:05 [RFA/testsuite] Allow __libc_start_main above main in annota1.exp Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-09 16:41 ` Andrew Cagney
2002-01-29 21:57 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-29 22:59 ` Kevin Buettner
2002-01-30 7:01 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-01-30 21:08 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-02-09 8:19 ` Jim Blandy
2002-02-09 14:14 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-01-30 8:02 Michael Elizabeth Chastain
2002-01-30 8:37 ` Fernando Nasser
2002-02-09 8:18 ` Jim Blandy
2002-02-09 8:19 ` Jim Blandy
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox