From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@mvista.com>
To: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Cc: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@cygnus.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [RFA] W.I.P. AltiVec ppc registers support.
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2001 08:37:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20011129174621.B15429@nevyn.them.org> (raw)
Message-ID: <20011120083700.TnKdUrK9D44q2EVVhXQFAzyl3SWAt1tOt8cnL6TDDCQ@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1011129222000.ZM19585@ocotillo.lan>
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 03:20:00PM -0700, Kevin Buettner wrote:
> On Nov 29, 4:59pm, Elena Zannoni wrote:
>
> > > With regard to
> > >
> > > > Index: config/powerpc/nm-linux.h
> > > [...]
> > > > +#define FETCH_INFERIOR_REGISTERS
> > >
> > > I think this is a good thing. It *might not* be strictly necessary
> > > for adding AltiVec support via PEEKUSER / POKEUSER, but it does give
> > > us more control. Also doing this allows us to clean up the code in other
> > > ways. E.g, the following bit from config/powerpc/nm-linux.h can be
> > > removed:
> > >
> > > > extern int ppc_register_u_addr (int, int);
> > > > #define REGISTER_U_ADDR(addr, blockend, regno) \
> > > > (addr) = ppc_register_u_addr ((blockend),(regno));
> > >
> > > This in turn means that ppc_register_u_addr() can be made static
> > > and that the ``ustart'' parameter can be removed. All calls to
> > > register_addr() (in your new code) in ppc-linux-nat.c should be
> > > changed to invoke ppc_register_u_addr() directly.
> > >
> >
> > Unfortunately not. I thought the same, until I remembered about core
> > file debugging. That function is called by fetch_core_registers() in
> > core-aout.c.
>
> Hmm... I wonder if Linux/PPC even needs this function in core-aout.c.
> Daniel J. is the expert on this stuff. Daniel, doesn't Linux/PPC use
> core-regset.c instead?
I'd like to kill our use of core-aout.c. Linux/PPC never used a.out
cores, but unfortunately core-aout.c defines register_addr () as a
wrapper for REGISTER_U_ADDR. The last time I tried to remove
core-aout.c from a platform I got bitten.
I think, now that we are defining FETCH_INFERIOR_REGISTERS, we can do
without it - infptrace was the only big consumer I see remaining. So
we might be OK without using core-aout.c at all now.
My still-unsubmitted cross-core patches for PowerPC remove
core-regset.o also, and very unpleasantly turn ppc-linux-nat.c into a
target-dependant rather than native-dependant file, so that we can grub
through the gregsets by hand. If you've got a better idea I'd love to
hear it :) It will be made somewhat easier by the destruction of
regmap[].
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-11-29 22:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-11-28 18:09 Elena Zannoni
2001-11-18 13:27 ` Elena Zannoni
2001-11-18 14:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-19 12:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-29 9:04 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-29 13:10 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-19 16:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-29 13:34 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-19 16:42 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-29 14:11 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-19 22:22 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-29 14:27 ` Elena Zannoni
2001-11-19 23:55 ` Elena Zannoni
2001-11-28 22:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-02 10:28 ` Elena Zannoni
2001-12-02 12:19 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-12-02 14:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-02 22:25 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-28 18:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-18 13:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-29 10:40 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-19 15:15 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-19 18:51 ` Elena Zannoni
2001-11-29 13:53 ` Elena Zannoni
2001-11-29 14:21 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-19 22:53 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-29 14:42 ` Elena Zannoni
2001-11-20 8:37 ` Elena Zannoni
2001-11-29 15:03 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-20 8:54 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-29 16:27 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-20 16:00 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-20 16:14 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-21 3:33 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-29 17:41 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-29 16:43 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-29 16:36 ` Elena Zannoni
2001-11-20 16:10 ` Elena Zannoni
2001-11-29 17:40 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-20 18:00 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-29 14:47 ` Daniel Jacobowitz [this message]
2001-11-20 8:37 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-20 9:07 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-20 9:08 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-29 15:33 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-29 15:15 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-29 15:38 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-20 9:13 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-20 10:09 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-29 15:47 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-11-29 15:58 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-20 10:59 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-29 15:59 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-20 11:07 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-29 16:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-20 11:17 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-20 17:52 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-29 17:39 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-29 18:20 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-21 4:10 ` Andrew Cagney
2001-11-29 22:36 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-11-21 5:56 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2001-12-20 10:02 ` Elena Zannoni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20011129174621.B15429@nevyn.them.org \
--to=drow@mvista.com \
--cc=ezannoni@cygnus.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=kevinb@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox