Re: [RFC]: Solib search (Was: Re: Cross solib support; continued)

[Orjan Friberg <orjan.friberg@axis.com>]

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> This is not how one should test for an absoulte file name portably,
> and incrementing in_pathname by one is not how you portably make it a
> relative file name.  I suggest to use IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH for the first
> and this for the second:
> 
>    while (!IS_DIR_SEPARATOR (*in_pathname++))
>      ;

If I understand you correctly, your suggestion is:

  if (found_file < 0 && IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (in_pathname))
    {
      while (!IS_DIR_SEPARATOR (*in_pathname++))
        ;
    }

That will only get rid of the first dir separator.
To me it seems it should be something like:

  if (found_file < 0 && IS_ABSOLUTE_PATH (in_pathname))
    {
      while (IS_DIR_SEPARATOR (*in_pathname))
        in_pathname++;
    }

(Can't use while (IS_DIR_SEPARATOR (*in_pathname++)) as it would remove the first
non-dir separator also.)

-- 
Orjan Friberg
Axis Communications AB