Re: [RFA] More completion improvements

[Eli Zaretskii <eliz@delorie.com>]

> Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2001 09:55:28 -0500
> From: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>
> 
> In the general case, it is always nice to see if the maintainer of the
> file has some objection though, as he/she may have a better idea of how
> something should be used or some other detail that requires a "field
> expert" opinion.
> This does not apply to your patch though.  You are just giving extra
> information to the CLI so it can do a smarter completion.

Okay, thanks for clarifying this.  I think I'll wait for a day or two,
to let others chance to send comments, just to be on the safe side.

> The exception would be the extra help lines you've added.

Ahm... what extra help lines?  I don't think I added anything, I just
changed indentation a bit where it was required by calling a different
function (e.g., add_set_enum_cmd instead of add_set_cmd), which moves
the left parenthesis a bit, and thus changes indentation of the
following lines.

> I am a completion addict

That makes two of us.  I'm so addicted to completion I cannot use any
interface that lacks it without being disgusted.