Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Simon Marchi <simark@simark.ca>
To: Victor Collod <vcollod@nvidia.com>, gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] Add i386 support for endbr skipping
Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2020 07:27:38 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1d846c51-1736-45a6-b4ae-5bae77314b49@simark.ca> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200611225455.9354-2-vcollod@nvidia.com>

On 2020-06-11 6:54 p.m., Victor Collod via Gdb-patches wrote:
> 2020-06-11  Victor Collod  <vcollod@nvidia.com>
> 
> 	* i386-tdep.c (i386_skip_endbr): Add a helper function to skip endbr.
> 	(i386_analyze_prologue): Call i386_skip_endbr.
> ---
>  gdb/i386-tdep.c | 19 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 19 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/gdb/i386-tdep.c b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
> index 9b905c1996a..263a3fd452e 100644
> --- a/gdb/i386-tdep.c
> +++ b/gdb/i386-tdep.c
> @@ -1537,6 +1537,24 @@ struct i386_insn i386_frame_setup_skip_insns[] =
>    { 0 }
>  };
>  
> +/* Check whether PC points to an endbr32 instruction.  */
> +static CORE_ADDR
> +i386_skip_endbr (CORE_ADDR pc)
> +{
> +  static const gdb_byte endbr32[] = { 0xf3, 0x0f, 0x1e, 0xfb };
> +
> +  gdb_byte buf[sizeof (endbr32)];
> +
> +  /* Stop there if we can't read the code */
> +  if (target_read_code (pc, buf, sizeof (endbr32)))
> +    return pc;
> +
> +  /* If the instruction isn't an endbr32, stop */
> +  if (memcmp (buf, endbr32, sizeof (endbr32)) != 0)
> +    return pc;
> +
> +  return pc + sizeof (endbr32);
> +}
>  
>  /* Check whether PC points to a no-op instruction.  */
>  static CORE_ADDR
> @@ -1814,6 +1832,7 @@ i386_analyze_prologue (struct gdbarch *gdbarch,
>  		       CORE_ADDR pc, CORE_ADDR current_pc,
>  		       struct i386_frame_cache *cache)
>  {
> +  pc = i386_skip_endbr (pc);
>    pc = i386_skip_noop (pc);
>    pc = i386_follow_jump (gdbarch, pc);
>    pc = i386_analyze_struct_return (pc, current_pc, cache);
> -- 
> 2.20.1

Hi Victor,

I hadn't realized that this instriction also existed in the 32 bit variant.

The patch looks fine, but is just missing a test.  You could maybe adapt
gdb.arch/amd64-prologue-skip-cf-protection.exp so that it runs on i386 as
well?  If so, I'd rename it from amd64- to i386-, like there are other tests
running on both amd64 and i386 that are prefixed i386.  It's not great, but
at least it would be consistent.

Simon


  reply	other threads:[~2020-06-21 11:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-06-05 23:23 [PATCH] Improve intel IBT support Victor Collod
2020-06-05 23:55 ` Victor Collod
2020-06-11  3:18 ` Simon Marchi
2020-06-11 22:54   ` [PATCH v2 0/2] " Victor Collod
2020-06-11 22:54     ` [PATCH v2 1/2] Add i386 support for endbr skipping Victor Collod
2020-06-21 11:27       ` Simon Marchi [this message]
2020-06-11 22:54     ` [PATCH v2 2/2] Refactor amd64_analyze_prologue Victor Collod
2020-06-21 11:38       ` Simon Marchi
2020-06-24  1:28         ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Improve intel IBT support Victor Collod
2020-06-24  1:28           ` [PATCH v3 1/7] Add i386 support for endbr skipping Victor Collod
2020-08-06 13:57             ` Simon Marchi
2020-09-19  0:29               ` [PATCH] gdb: Update i386_analyze_prologue to skip endbr32 H.J. Lu
2020-09-19  0:38                 ` Simon Marchi
2020-06-24  1:28           ` [PATCH v3 2/7] amd64_analyze_prologue: swap upper bound check condition operands Victor Collod
2020-08-06 14:41             ` Simon Marchi
2020-06-24  1:28           ` [PATCH v3 3/7] amd64_analyze_prologue: merge op and buf Victor Collod
2020-08-06 14:55             ` Simon Marchi
2020-06-24  1:28           ` [PATCH v3 4/7] amd64_analyze_prologue: invert a condition for readability Victor Collod
2020-08-06 14:57             ` Simon Marchi
2020-06-24  1:28           ` [PATCH v3 5/7] amd64_analyze_prologue: gradually update pc Victor Collod
2020-08-06 14:59             ` Simon Marchi
2020-06-24  1:28           ` [PATCH v3 6/7] amd64_analyze_prologue: fix incorrect comment Victor Collod
2020-08-06 15:05             ` Simon Marchi
2020-06-24  1:28           ` [PATCH v3 7/7] amd64_analyze_prologue: use target_read_code instead of read_code Victor Collod
2020-08-06 15:01             ` Simon Marchi
2020-08-05 21:44           ` [PATCH v3 0/7] Improve intel IBT support Victor Collod

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1d846c51-1736-45a6-b4ae-5bae77314b49@simark.ca \
    --to=simark@simark.ca \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    --cc=vcollod@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox