Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nick Roberts <nickrob@gnu.org>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: Andrew Cagney <cagney@gnu.org>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Commit] New file
Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 20:09:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <16572.57896.656817.426622@nick.uklinux.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7137-Tue01Jun2004064914+0300-eliz@gnu.org>

 > > Since this is largely an EMACS issue, can yourself, RMS, and Nick try to 
 > > resolve this and come back with a recommendation?
 > 
 > I have no problems talking with Richard first, but it seems to me that
 > the issue is whether to have gdb-mi.el in GDB, which is something we,
 > as GDB maintainers, could decide on our own.

I think Andrew is (wisely) declining to pick up the gauntlet that you threw
down in an earlier e-mail. You've certainly made your opinion clear but you
don't seem to be offering an alternative. You talk of bit-rot but this could
equally apply to GDB/MI if front-ends don't adopt this interface.

I see new MI commands that Emacs needs and I would like to discuss their
implementation within the context of gdb-mi.el. Up till now the entry level to
try out gdb-mi.el was to check out CVS versions of both GDB and Emacs and
download the file from my homepage. Rather unsurprisingly, I've had no
feedback. After the next release of GDB and Emacs, typing M-x gdbmi would be
enough. Its about lowering the entry threshold.

I do this work for fun and because I think it has social value. It ceases to
be fun if there are disagreements. If GDB maintainers want to remove this file
then I certainly won't contest it. I will, however, look for a more profitable
way to spend my time.

Nick


  reply	other threads:[~2004-06-01 20:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-05-25 20:07 Nick Roberts
2004-05-25 22:36 ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-26  9:54   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-26  9:51 ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-26 16:45   ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-27  7:23     ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-27 20:19       ` Andrew Cagney
2004-05-28  7:54         ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-28 19:52           ` Nick Roberts
2004-05-31 19:07             ` Andrew Cagney
2004-06-01  4:35               ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-06-01 20:09                 ` Nick Roberts [this message]
2004-06-01 22:21                   ` Eli Zaretskii
2004-05-26 20:43   ` Nick Roberts

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=16572.57896.656817.426622@nick.uklinux.net \
    --to=nickrob@gnu.org \
    --cc=cagney@gnu.org \
    --cc=eliz@gnu.org \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox