Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
To: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Cc: Tom Tromey <tom@tromey.com>
Subject: [RFA 2/3] use user_breakpoint_p in python code
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 22:06:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463695563-4130-3-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1463695563-4130-1-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com>

I noticed that bppy_get_visibility and gdbpy_breakpoint_created
implemented their own visibility checks, but subtly different from
user_breakpoint_p.  I think the latter is more correct, and so changed
the Python code to use it.

I suspect there isn't a decent way to test this, so no new test.

Built and regtested on x86-64 Fedora 23.

2016-05-19  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>

	* python/py-breakpoint.c (bppy_get_visibility)
	(gdbpy_breakpoint_created): Use user_breakpoint_p.
---
 gdb/ChangeLog              | 5 +++++
 gdb/python/py-breakpoint.c | 8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/ChangeLog b/gdb/ChangeLog
index 0968b85..a03d290 100644
--- a/gdb/ChangeLog
+++ b/gdb/ChangeLog
@@ -1,3 +1,8 @@
+2016-05-19  Tom Tromey  <tom@tromey.com>
+
+	* python/py-breakpoint.c (bppy_get_visibility)
+	(gdbpy_breakpoint_created): Use user_breakpoint_p.
+
 2016-05-19  Andreas Schwab  <schwab@suse.de>
 
 	* ia64-libunwind-tdep.c (libunwind_descr): Add cast from void *.
diff --git a/gdb/python/py-breakpoint.c b/gdb/python/py-breakpoint.c
index 611a41e..f86da8d 100644
--- a/gdb/python/py-breakpoint.c
+++ b/gdb/python/py-breakpoint.c
@@ -540,10 +540,10 @@ bppy_get_visibility (PyObject *self, void *closure)
 
   BPPY_REQUIRE_VALID (self_bp);
 
-  if (self_bp->bp->number < 0)
-    Py_RETURN_FALSE;
+  if (user_breakpoint_p (self_bp->bp))
+    Py_RETURN_TRUE;
 
-  Py_RETURN_TRUE;
+  Py_RETURN_FALSE;
 }
 
 /* Python function to determine if the breakpoint is a temporary
@@ -862,7 +862,7 @@ gdbpy_breakpoint_created (struct breakpoint *bp)
   gdbpy_breakpoint_object *newbp;
   PyGILState_STATE state;
 
-  if (bp->number < 0 && bppy_pending_object == NULL)
+  if (!user_breakpoint_p (bp) && bppy_pending_object == NULL)
     return;
 
   if (bp->type != bp_breakpoint
-- 
2.5.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-05-19 22:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-19 22:06 [RFA 0/4] Add "pending" attribute to gdb.Breakpoint Tom Tromey
2016-05-19 22:06 ` [RFA 3/3] PR python/17698 - add Breakpoint.pending Tom Tromey
2016-05-20  5:46   ` Eli Zaretskii
2016-05-20 14:29   ` Phil Muldoon
2016-07-13  8:16   ` Yao Qi
2016-05-19 22:06 ` Tom Tromey [this message]
2016-05-20 14:30   ` [RFA 2/3] use user_breakpoint_p in python code Phil Muldoon
2016-07-13  8:09   ` Yao Qi
2016-05-19 22:06 ` [RFA 1/3] Rearrange Python breakpoint node in documentation Tom Tromey
2016-05-20  5:45   ` Eli Zaretskii

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1463695563-4130-3-git-send-email-tom@tromey.com \
    --to=tom@tromey.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox