Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yao Qi <yao@codesourcery.com>
To: <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: [PATCH/arm] Backtrace through exception frames on arm/cortex-m target
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2012 14:16:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1352816140-3221-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com> (raw)

Hi,
This patch adds support for backtracing through exceptions on
M-profile targets.  Dan wrote this patch two years ago, tested
by hand that set a breakpoint on an interrupt handler and GDB will
show the complete stack frame including the exception handler
and the source location that caused the fault.  I update the patch a
little for some API changes in GDB trunk.

I considered to write a test case for this, but it hard to write
single case for different corex-m boards with different system
libraries.  So no test case is included.

Regression tested for arm-none-eabi (-march=armv6-m and -march=armv7-m
respectively) and arm-none-linux-gnueabi (-marm/-mthumb
-march=armv4/-mthumb -march=armv7-a).  OK to apply?

gdb:

2012-11-13  Daniel Jacobowitz  <dan@codesourcery.com>
	    Yao Qi  <yao@codesourcery.com>

	* arm-tdep.c (arm_addr_bits_remove): Do not adjust the low
	bit of EXC_RETURN.
	(arm_m_exception_cache, arm_m_exception_this_id)
	(arm_m_exception_prev_register, arm_m_exception_unwind_sniffer)
	(arm_m_exception_unwind): New.
	(arm_gdbarch_init): Register arm_m_exception_unwind.
---
 gdb/arm-tdep.c |  104 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 files changed, 104 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gdb/arm-tdep.c b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
index 1a67366..5f22649 100644
--- a/gdb/arm-tdep.c
+++ b/gdb/arm-tdep.c
@@ -448,6 +448,11 @@ arm_pc_is_thumb (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR memaddr)
 static CORE_ADDR
 arm_addr_bits_remove (struct gdbarch *gdbarch, CORE_ADDR val)
 {
+  /* On M-profile devices, do not strip the low bit from EXC_RETURN
+     (the magic exception return address).  */
+  if (gdbarch_tdep (gdbarch)->is_m && (val & 0xfffffff0) == 0xfffffff0)
+    return val;
+
   if (arm_apcs_32)
     return UNMAKE_THUMB_ADDR (val);
   else
@@ -2926,6 +2931,103 @@ struct frame_unwind arm_stub_unwind = {
   arm_stub_unwind_sniffer
 };
 
+static struct arm_prologue_cache *
+arm_m_exception_cache (struct frame_info *this_frame)
+{
+  struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
+  enum bfd_endian byte_order = gdbarch_byte_order (gdbarch);
+  struct arm_prologue_cache *cache;
+  CORE_ADDR unwound_sp;
+  LONGEST xpsr;
+
+  cache = FRAME_OBSTACK_ZALLOC (struct arm_prologue_cache);
+  cache->saved_regs = trad_frame_alloc_saved_regs (this_frame);
+
+  unwound_sp = get_frame_register_unsigned (this_frame, ARM_SP_REGNUM);
+
+  cache->saved_regs[0].addr = unwound_sp;
+  cache->saved_regs[1].addr = unwound_sp + 4;
+  cache->saved_regs[2].addr = unwound_sp + 8;
+  cache->saved_regs[3].addr = unwound_sp + 12;
+  cache->saved_regs[12].addr = unwound_sp + 16;
+  cache->saved_regs[14].addr = unwound_sp + 20;
+  cache->saved_regs[15].addr = unwound_sp + 24;
+  cache->saved_regs[ARM_PS_REGNUM].addr = unwound_sp + 28;
+
+  /* If bit 9 of the saved xPSR is set, then there is a four-byte
+     aligner between the top of the 32-byte stack frame and the
+     previous context's stack pointer.  */
+  cache->prev_sp = unwound_sp + 32;
+  if (safe_read_memory_integer (unwound_sp + 28, 4, byte_order, &xpsr)
+      && (xpsr & (1 << 9)) != 0)
+    cache->prev_sp += 4;
+
+  return cache;
+}
+
+/* Our frame ID for a stub frame is the current SP and LR.  */
+
+static void
+arm_m_exception_this_id (struct frame_info *this_frame,
+			 void **this_cache,
+			 struct frame_id *this_id)
+{
+  struct arm_prologue_cache *cache;
+
+  if (*this_cache == NULL)
+    *this_cache = arm_m_exception_cache (this_frame);
+  cache = *this_cache;
+
+  *this_id = frame_id_build (cache->prev_sp, get_frame_pc (this_frame));
+}
+
+static struct value *
+arm_m_exception_prev_register (struct frame_info *this_frame,
+			       void **this_cache,
+			       int prev_regnum)
+{
+  struct gdbarch *gdbarch = get_frame_arch (this_frame);
+  struct arm_prologue_cache *cache;
+
+  if (*this_cache == NULL)
+    *this_cache = arm_m_exception_cache (this_frame);
+  cache = *this_cache;
+
+  /* The value was already reconstructed into PREV_SP.  */
+  if (prev_regnum == ARM_SP_REGNUM)
+    return frame_unwind_got_constant (this_frame, prev_regnum, cache->prev_sp);
+
+  return trad_frame_get_prev_register (this_frame, cache->saved_regs,
+				       prev_regnum);
+}
+
+static int
+arm_m_exception_unwind_sniffer (const struct frame_unwind *self,
+				struct frame_info *this_frame,
+				void **this_prologue_cache)
+{
+  CORE_ADDR this_pc = get_frame_pc (this_frame);
+
+  /* No need to check is_m; this sniffer is only registered for
+     M-profile architectures.  */
+
+  /* Exception frames return to one of these magic PCs.  Other values
+     are not defined as of v7-M.  */
+  if (this_pc == 0xfffffff1 || this_pc == 0xfffffff9 || this_pc == 0xfffffffd)
+    return 1;
+
+  return 0;
+}
+
+struct frame_unwind arm_m_exception_unwind = {
+  SIGTRAMP_FRAME,
+  default_frame_unwind_stop_reason,
+  arm_m_exception_this_id,
+  arm_m_exception_prev_register,
+  NULL,
+  arm_m_exception_unwind_sniffer
+};
+
 static CORE_ADDR
 arm_normal_frame_base (struct frame_info *this_frame, void **this_cache)
 {
@@ -10218,6 +10320,8 @@ arm_gdbarch_init (struct gdbarch_info info, struct gdbarch_list *arches)
   dwarf2_frame_set_init_reg (gdbarch, arm_dwarf2_frame_init_reg);
 
   /* Add some default predicates.  */
+  if (is_m)
+    frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &arm_m_exception_unwind);
   frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &arm_stub_unwind);
   dwarf2_append_unwinders (gdbarch);
   frame_unwind_append_unwinder (gdbarch, &arm_exidx_unwind);
-- 
1.7.7.6


             reply	other threads:[~2012-11-13 14:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-11-13 14:16 Yao Qi [this message]
2012-11-13 14:27 ` Mark Kettenis
2012-11-13 14:44   ` Yao Qi
2012-11-13 15:12     ` Mark Kettenis
2012-11-13 15:50 ` Joel Brobecker
2012-11-14  2:23   ` Yao Qi
2012-11-14  2:57     ` Joel Brobecker
2012-11-14  3:48       ` Yao Qi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1352816140-3221-1-git-send-email-yao@codesourcery.com \
    --to=yao@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox