Re: [RFA][patch 1/9] Yet another respin of the patch with initial Python support

[Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>]

On Sat, 2008-07-26 at 22:17 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Here's something that should explain what I have in mind (details
> might be factually incorrect):

Thanks for this text. I think it can be mostly used, except...

> 
>   When executing the @code{python} command, Python exceptions uncaught
>   within the Python code are translated to calls to @value{GDBN}
>   error-reporting mechanism, which terminates the currently executing
>   command and prints an error message containing the Python exception
>   name, the associated value, and the Python call stack backtrace at
>   the point where the exception was raised.  Example:

... it is not necessarily true that GDB will terminate the currently
executing command when the Python exception is converted to a GDB
exception. If the Python script is extending some GDB subsystem (one of
our goals), that subsystem can catch the exception and deal with it in
another way. So for this part I suggest:

... are translated to calls to @value{GDBN} error-handling mechanism,
which depending on the context of the Python script can either deal
with the error in a subsystem-specific way, or terminate the currently
executing command ...

What do you think?
-- 
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center