Re: [RFA][patch 1/9] Yet another respin of the patch with initial Python support

Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-08-05T18:58:52Z

On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 09:49:18PM +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2008 14:23:05 -0400
> > From: Daniel Jacobowitz <drow@false.org>
> > Cc: bauerman@br.ibm.com, tromey@redhat.com, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
> >
> > When executing Python code, uncaught Python exceptions are translated
> > to calls to the @value{GDBN} error-reporting mechanism. If
> > @value{GDBN} does not handle the error, it will terminate the current
> > operation and print an error message containing the Python exception
> > name, the associated value, and the Python call stack backtrace at the
> > point where the exception was raised. Example:
>
> As I said, I don't see the (marginal, IMO) case of Python invoked by
> something other than a command worth obscuring this already quite
> complicated description. So I suggest to reinstate "command" in the
> second sentence, since this is the most frequent situation users will
> see.

OK, let's use command then.

--
Daniel Jacobowitz
CodeSourcery