Re: [RFC][patch 0/9] Python support in GDB

Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-04-30T16:42:05Z

On Wed, 2008-04-30 at 06:21 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> I understand the urge to avoid unnecessary work. That is why I said
> _minimal_ documentation. I find it hard to believe that nothing can
> be said about this feature that will not change based on further
> discussion.

Oh, I see. Yes, it's perfectly reasonable.

> Unless all that discussion happens before the patches are
> committed to the GDB CVS, in which case I have no problems waiting
> till then. But whenever the patches are actually committed, I will
> object to doing so without some minimal documentation that describes
> its usage.

I'm inclined to take this approach. At the moment I prefer to see what
folks will say about the current implementation, and when at least one
of these patches is ready to be committed I'll include documentation to
go with it.
--
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center