Re: [RFA][patch 1/9] Yet another respin of the patch with initial Python support

Thiago Jung Bauermann
2008-08-05T03:42:50Z

On Mon, 2008-08-04 at 22:17 +0300, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > From: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauerman@br.ibm.com>
> > In that case, my opinion is that the current "Canned Sequences of
> > Commands" chapter should be demoted to a section (and its sections would
> > then be demoted to subsubsections), and both this section and Python's
> > section should be under a chapter called "Extending GDB".
>
> Agreed.
>
> > Rereading this thread, I think this is what Daniel suggested in the
> > first place.
>
> And I agreed:
>
> >> Ok, in that case I have an alternative suggestion: how about renaming
> >> the combined scripting chapter, and putting both Python scripting and
> >> the existing information in the new chapter?
> >
> > I have no objections to renaming that chapter.

Great, I wasn't sure about the demotion part. I guess I was just dazed
and confused. I made that change, then.

Now we have a chapter describing both canned commands, and the fresh
python scripts.
--
[]'s
Thiago Jung Bauermann
IBM Linux Technology Center