From: Luis Machado <luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@codesourcery.com>
Cc: gdb-patches@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: MI testsuite fix
Date: Thu, 10 Apr 2008 21:42:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1207859802.9173.15.camel@gargoyle> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200804102102.07722.pedro@codesourcery.com>
Thanks for the patch.
On Thu, 2008-04-10 at 21:02 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> Fixing this leaves me with one MI regression, mi-pending.exp, which is
> related to throwing an exception running the exec cleanups, which deletes
> the MI token, when it shouldn't. That is fixed by Vladimir's pending
> "murder exec cleanup" patch, or when the token in *stopped is removed.
> Both will go in very soon.
This is still happening on PPC. So i assume this will be fixed with
Vladimir's patch as well.
There is an additional failure in the MI testsuite (PPC) when running in
asynch mode, mi-simplerun.exp and mi2-simplerun.exp, which seems to be
an output ordering issue as well.
"Correct" output:
220-exec-continue^M
220^running^M
(gdb) ^M
Hello, World!callme^M
callme^M
220*stopped,reason="exited-normally"^M
(gdb) ^M
PASS: gdb.mi/mi-simplerun.exp: continue to end
"Incorrect" output:
220-exec-continue^M
220^running^M
Hello, World!callme^M
callme^M
(gdb) ^M
FAIL: gdb.mi/mi-simplerun.exp: continue to end (failed to resume)
Correct and incorrect between "" because both ending results are valid.
This is not fixed by your latest patch, Pedro. What do you think?
Regards,
--
Luis Machado
Software Engineer
IBM Linux Technology Center
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-10 20:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-10 20:37 Pedro Alves
2008-04-10 21:42 ` Luis Machado [this message]
2008-04-10 22:10 ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-10 23:13 ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-14 18:27 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-21 12:58 ` Pedro Alves
2008-04-21 14:04 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2008-04-21 15:05 ` Pedro Alves
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1207859802.9173.15.camel@gargoyle \
--to=luisgpm@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox