Re: [RFC] New threadnum command for breakpoints

[Frederic RISS <frederic.riss@st.com>]

ping?

> > > If you want it to be the last stopped thread, which seems reasonable,
> > > is there a better name we could give it?  Or is $_gdb_thread
> > > sufficiently clear?
> > 
> > I'm not sure. The name itself looks fine to me but, speaking as a user,
> > I find the leading '_' a bit strange. It seems to imply something about
> > the variable, but it's not clear what. 
> > If it was a convention and all variables would share the same prefix,
> > then it wouldn't feel so strange. On the other side if we want to use a
> > common convention we've got to start somewhere.
> > Anyway that's just a personal feeling, and really no big deal, maybe
> > others could share their opinion?
> 
> Nobody seems to care. How about we go on with the current patch (modulo
> the doco fix that Eli requested)? 
> 
> Current patch:
> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb-patches/2006-07/msg00434.html
> 
> Fred.
>