Mirror of the gdb-patches mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/ob] not_a_breakpoint -> not_a_sw_breakpoint
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:43:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1020816164312.ZM11179@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com> "[patch/ob] not_a_breakpoint -> not_a_sw_breakpoint" (Aug 16, 11:37am)

On Aug 16, 11:37am, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> This patch renames the ``not_a_breakpoint'' parameter of 
> bpstat_stop_status() to the more correct ``not_a_sw_breakpoint'' so that 
> it is clear that it is indicating nothing about hardware breakpoints.

This may be a good change, but I don't think it's obvious.  Could
you at least explain the reasoning that lead you to conclude that
the parameter in question indicates nothing about hardware breakpoints?

Kevin


  parent reply	other threads:[~2002-08-16 16:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2002-08-16  8:37 Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16  8:49 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-16 10:34   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16 10:38     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-16 10:43       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16 10:47         ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-16 10:53           ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16 10:56             ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2002-08-16 11:04               ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16  9:43 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2002-08-16 10:34   ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16 11:52     ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-16 12:34       ` Andrew Cagney
2002-08-16 13:12         ` Kevin Buettner
2002-08-16 13:34           ` Andrew Cagney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1020816164312.ZM11179@localhost.localdomain \
    --to=kevinb@redhat.com \
    --cc=ac131313@ges.redhat.com \
    --cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox