From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gdb-patches-return-17673-listarch-gdb-patches=sourceware.cygnus.com@sources.redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 6703 invoked by alias); 16 Aug 2002 16:43:19 -0000
Mailing-List: contact gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gdb-patches-subscribe@sources.redhat.com>
List-Archive: <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/gdb-patches/>
List-Post: <mailto:gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>
List-Help: <mailto:gdb-patches-help@sources.redhat.com>, <http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs>
Sender: gdb-patches-owner@sources.redhat.com
Received: (qmail 6696 invoked from network); 16 Aug 2002 16:43:18 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 16 Aug 2002 16:43:18 -0000
Received: from int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (nat-pool-rdu.redhat.com [172.16.52.200] (may be forged))
	by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7GGTKl03587
	for <gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com>; Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:29:21 -0400
Received: from potter.sfbay.redhat.com (potter.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.15])
	by int-mx2.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7GGhFu01765;
	Fri, 16 Aug 2002 12:43:15 -0400
Received: from romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (remus.sfbay.redhat.com [172.16.27.252])
	by potter.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id g7GGhEe18884;
	Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:43:14 -0700
Received: (from kev@localhost)
	by romulus.sfbay.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g7GGhCr11180;
	Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:43:12 -0700
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2002 09:43:00 -0000
From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1020816164312.ZM11179@localhost.localdomain>
In-Reply-To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>
        "[patch/ob] not_a_breakpoint -> not_a_sw_breakpoint" (Aug 16, 11:37am)
References: <3D5D1C3E.8070203@ges.redhat.com>
To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313@ges.redhat.com>, gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: [patch/ob] not_a_breakpoint -> not_a_sw_breakpoint
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-SW-Source: 2002-08/txt/msg00423.txt.bz2

On Aug 16, 11:37am, Andrew Cagney wrote:

> This patch renames the ``not_a_breakpoint'' parameter of 
> bpstat_stop_status() to the more correct ``not_a_sw_breakpoint'' so that 
> it is clear that it is indicating nothing about hardware breakpoints.

This may be a good change, but I don't think it's obvious.  Could
you at least explain the reasoning that lead you to conclude that
the parameter in question indicates nothing about hardware breakpoints?

Kevin