From: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>
To: Fernando Nasser <fnasser@redhat.com>,
Michael Snyder <msnyder@cygnus.com>
Cc: Kevin Buettner <kevinb@cygnus.com>, Jim Blandy <jimb@cygnus.com>,
gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com, Keith Seitz <keiths@cygnus.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFA] breakpoint.c: Pass breakpoint type to set_raw_breakpoint()
Date: Fri, 11 May 2001 11:35:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1010511183521.ZM28626@ocotillo.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3AFC2113.5A85D353@redhat.com>
On May 11, 1:27pm, Fernando Nasser wrote:
> > Kevin, I like it, but I noticed that set_raw_breakpoint is not static.
> > It was made extern in 1998, and is used by gdbtk-cmds.c.
> >
> > Can you check to see if that call needs a bp_type argument, and if that
> > call can't be eliminated, maybe you should add a prototype to breakpoint.h.
>
> I believe it can be made static now. I don't think anyone should be
> using it outside breakpoint.c.
>
> Keith, does your new gdbtk-bp.c uses this function?
Does Keith have a version that's not checked in yet?
I did an update a moment ago and notice that set_raw_breakpoint is
still used by gdbtk-bp.c. Here's a telling comment from this file...
/*
* These are routines we need from breakpoint.c.
* at some point make these static in breakpoint.c and move GUI code there
*/
extern struct breakpoint *set_raw_breakpoint (struct symtab_and_line sal);
extern void set_breakpoint_count (int);
extern int breakpoint_count;
I will adjust the set_raw_breakpoint() calls in gdbtk-bp.c to pass the
extra argument. I'll let Keith (or someone else more familiar with
these issues than I am) decide whether a prototype ought to be added
to breakpoint.h or if the calls in gdbtk-bp.c can be eliminated (thus
allowing breakpoint.c to make set_raw_breakpoint() static again).
Kevin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-11 11:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-11 0:51 Kevin Buettner
2001-05-11 8:39 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-05-11 12:04 ` Kevin Buettner
2001-05-11 10:16 ` Jim Blandy
2001-05-11 10:18 ` Michael Snyder
2001-05-11 10:29 ` Fernando Nasser
2001-05-11 11:35 ` Kevin Buettner [this message]
2001-05-11 16:52 ` Keith Seitz
2001-05-11 13:10 ` Kevin Buettner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1010511183521.ZM28626@ocotillo.lan \
--to=kevinb@cygnus.com \
--cc=fnasser@redhat.com \
--cc=gdb-patches@sources.redhat.com \
--cc=jimb@cygnus.com \
--cc=keiths@cygnus.com \
--cc=msnyder@cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox