From: "Pierre Muller" <pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr>
To: "'Pedro Alves'" <pedro@codesourcery.com>, <gdb-patches@sourceware.org>
Subject: RE: [RFC] Mingw Windows 64-bit gdbserver
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2010 16:20:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <001901cadd80$b476aff0$1d640fd0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <201004161659.37990.pedro@codesourcery.com>
> -----Message d'origine-----
> De : gdb-patches-owner@sourceware.org [mailto:gdb-patches-
> owner@sourceware.org] De la part de Pedro Alves
> Envoyé : Friday, April 16, 2010 6:00 PM
> À : gdb-patches@sourceware.org
> Cc : Pierre Muller
> Objet : Re: [RFC] Mingw Windows 64-bit gdbserver
>
> On Friday 16 April 2010 16:31:51, Pierre Muller wrote:
> > This patch tries to implement support for
> > gdbserver on Windows 64-bit, using the mingw32
> > cross compiler to windows-64bit.
> >
> > I am unsure if anyone else already tried this,
> > but searching in gdb-patches I didn't find anything...
> > Don't hesitate to tell me otherwise...
> >
> > The resulting gdbserver seem usable to me,
> >
> > I do have a few questions:
> > - About the new file, win64-amd64-low.c
> > should I remove the copyright years and only leave 2010?
> > should I state that it is adapted from win32-i386-low.c?
>
> How about instead merging the files, like
> linux-x86-low.c handles both 64-bit and 32-bit? There's
> a lot of common stuff between both archs support, it
> seems.
Yes, but ...
> Also, is there any debug API limitation that would
> make it impossible for a 64-bit gdbserver to debug a 32-bit
> inferior (that is, multi-arch the Windows gdbserver)?
It not impossible, but it doesn't work
without using some new API functions:
Wow64GetThreadContext, Wow64GetThreadSelectorEntry,
and Wow64SetThreadContext
See http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/ms679303%28VS.85%29.aspx
This would also be required to be able to debug win32
application within a windows 64-bit GDB executable.
Implementing this is probably a larger patch than this one ...
> That being possible would be another reason to just merge
> the files up from the start.
So that argument falls!
> >
> > - About gdbserver/configure regeneration:
> > this added several lines:
> > +/* Needed for new procfs interface on sparc-solaris. */
> > +#define _STRUCTURED_PROC 1
> > I did use autoconf version 2.64 as required...
> > Is this normal?
>
> Yes, it just means that someone change src/bfd/bfd.m4,
> and this configure had never been regenerated
> (gdbserver/acinclude.m4 pulls in bfd.m4).
> You could just regenerate the file and apply that bit
> alone, independently of your real gdbserver changes, so
> your changes are clean. Want to do that?
Done.
> >
> > - About the used communication library:
> > -lwsock32 was not found by the mingw, but main gdb
> > doesn't seem to use it, should we move to ws2_32 for both win32 and
> win64?
>
> Don't we need to make gdbserver include windows2.h instead of winsock.h
> too?
No, I only found #include <windows.h>
> >
> > I still do have a problem when I connect
> > to win64 gdbserver from a multi target win32 gdb executable,
> > somehow, the library list does not seem to correctly
> > read in the library addresses... Still investigating this.
> > It seems related to the fact that I do not have
> > local copies of my remote DLLs.
> >
>
> > Final question:
> > Does that patch deserve a documentation or NEWS entry?
>
> At least the latter, definitely.
Should be easy to add.
Pierre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-16 16:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-16 15:32 Pierre Muller
2010-04-16 15:59 ` Pedro Alves
2010-04-16 16:20 ` Pierre Muller [this message]
2010-04-16 16:27 ` Pedro Alves
2010-04-16 16:38 ` Pierre Muller
2010-04-16 17:15 ` Pedro Alves
2010-04-17 5:39 ` [RFA] Use winsock2 for mingw gdbserver Pierre Muller
2010-04-17 8:28 ` Pedro Alves
2010-04-17 20:44 ` Pierre Muller
2010-04-17 5:40 ` [RFC] Mingw Windows 64-bit gdbserver Pierre Muller
2010-04-17 10:58 ` Pedro Alves
2010-04-17 23:18 ` [RFC-v2] " Pierre Muller
2010-04-17 23:46 ` Pedro Alves
2010-04-19 6:37 ` [RFA] Prepare for " Pierre Muller
[not found] ` <6200558430975530197@unknownmsgid>
2010-04-19 13:56 ` H.J. Lu
2010-04-19 14:13 ` Pierre Muller
2010-04-16 16:27 [RFC] " Ozkan Sezer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to='001901cadd80$b476aff0$1d640fd0$@muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr' \
--to=pierre.muller@ics-cnrs.unistra.fr \
--cc=gdb-patches@sourceware.org \
--cc=pedro@codesourcery.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox