Re: URCU feature request?

[Olivier Dion via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org>]

On Tue, 02 Sep 2025, Thobias Knudsen via lttng-dev <lttng-dev@lists.lttng.org> wrote:
> Yes but all read/write operations doesn't have the syntax of a function as
> you used in the example here i.e. use(...). When it is a function you can
> easily just change the implementation to check if it is called inside a
> read section. Some reads and writes are usually done by this syntax (a = b)
> and '=' cannot be overridden.
>
> BTW just saying that what we're talking about now is not the original
> topic, but if someone has an elegant solution to this that would be
> nice!

I am confuse about the overall discussion here.  Are we talking about
static checking of RCU pointers usage or runtime checking?

Is is possible to see the implementation you made so I can understand
better?

Thanks,
Olivier
-- 
Olivier Dion
EfficiOS Inc.
https://www.efficios.com