From: skrishnakar@gmail.com (srikanth krishnakar)
Subject: [ltt-dev] LTTng on PowerPC 440 and no /proc/ltt support ?
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 21:30:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6213bc560903080900y2464253fq40f8c9e71d3ae74c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
hi all,
I have seen /proc/ltt is been dropped in latest LTTng for 2.6.29-rc7. How
the test procedure is adopted now ? Any new steps for testing the Lttng.
Has anyone tested LTTng for PowerPC 440 ?
Thanks & Regards
Srikanth
--
"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**********************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20090308/e4640fcf/attachment-0001.htm>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: skrishnakar@gmail.com (srikanth krishnakar)
Subject: [ltt-dev] LTTng on PowerPC 440 and no /proc/ltt support ?
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 21:30:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6213bc560903080900y2464253fq40f8c9e71d3ae74c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20090308160050.ffngtYCXhH8U2wIiplFEDRu8pQVuwtnpcWH9flwq5ug@z> (raw)
hi all,
I have seen /proc/ltt is been dropped in latest LTTng for 2.6.29-rc7. How
the test procedure is adopted now ? Any new steps for testing the Lttng.
Has anyone tested LTTng for PowerPC 440 ?
Thanks & Regards
Srikanth
--
"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**********************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/ltt-dev/attachments/20090308/e4640fcf/attachment.htm>
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: skrishnakar@gmail.com (srikanth krishnakar)
Subject: [ltt-dev] LTTng on PowerPC 440 and no /proc/ltt support ?
Date: Sun, 8 Mar 2009 21:30:50 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6213bc560903080900y2464253fq40f8c9e71d3ae74c@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20090308160050.RyZAwcwsgD1TF_LWbeBWGyml-hcPB43PeN-gc-KVpD8@z> (raw)
hi all,
I have seen /proc/ltt is been dropped in latest LTTng for 2.6.29-rc7. How
the test procedure is adopted now ? Any new steps for testing the Lttng.
Has anyone tested LTTng for PowerPC 440 ?
Thanks & Regards
Srikanth
--
"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"
Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**********************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20090308/e4640fcf/attachment-0002.htm>
next reply other threads:[~2009-03-08 16:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-08 16:00 srikanth krishnakar [this message]
2009-03-08 16:00 ` srikanth krishnakar
2009-03-08 16:00 ` srikanth krishnakar
2009-03-09 23:03 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6213bc560903080900y2464253fq40f8c9e71d3ae74c@mail.gmail.com \
--to=skrishnakar@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox