* [lttng-dev] [RFC] User space stack trace on system calls @ 2013-08-31 3:38 Francis Giraldeau 2013-08-31 3:59 ` Francis Giraldeau 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Francis Giraldeau @ 2013-08-31 3:38 UTC (permalink / raw) Hi, To locate where are made system calls in an application, I developed two prototypes that dumps stack traces. The first one is using event context [1]. When an tracepoint is reached, then the stack trace of the currently running userspace thread is done and saved. This event context can be attached to any event, thus this technique is general. The drawback is that the context is defined per channel, thus the user will usually wants a separate channel for selected events. The other drawback is related to the way lttng handles system call events. By enabling system calls, we get automatically both entries and exits events in a single channel, and thus the same user space stack trace is dumped twice. It also requires changes to lttng-tools. To avoid this issue, I also tried to create one event called sys_entry_callsite that is called only on sys_entry [2]. Thus, the stack trace is recorded only once. It's also possible to enable it with all other events in one channel. It's less flexible, but easier to use. It also requires to define a tracepoint in a module, so on latest ubuntu, it requires the modules to be signed. The code that dumps the stack trace is called only when the actual tracepoint is enabled. We actually found a way to insert code inside the probe with code blocks that returns a value. Thanks to Simon Marquis for this C trick! Both can have their use cases, so maybe both could be used? Anyway, I post both of them for discussion. [1] https://github.com/giraldeau/lttng-modules/blob/addons/lttng-context-callstack.c [2] https://github.com/giraldeau/lttng-modules/blob/addons/addons/lttng-syscall-entry.c Thanks! Francis Giraldeau ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [lttng-dev] [RFC] User space stack trace on system calls 2013-08-31 3:38 [lttng-dev] [RFC] User space stack trace on system calls Francis Giraldeau @ 2013-08-31 3:59 ` Francis Giraldeau 2013-08-31 5:16 ` Francis Giraldeau 0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread From: Francis Giraldeau @ 2013-08-31 3:59 UTC (permalink / raw) On 2013-08-30 23:38, Francis Giraldeau wrote : > We actually > found a way to insert code inside the probe with code blocks that > returns a value. Thanks to Simon Marchi for this C trick! Well, it turns out that the function save_stack_trace_user() is called even when the tracepoint is not enabled, so this is a major issue. Hum... Then why does it work for UST tracepoint macro? Cheers, Francis ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [lttng-dev] [RFC] User space stack trace on system calls 2013-08-31 3:59 ` Francis Giraldeau @ 2013-08-31 5:16 ` Francis Giraldeau 0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread From: Francis Giraldeau @ 2013-08-31 5:16 UTC (permalink / raw) Le 2013-08-30 23:59, Francis Giraldeau a ?crit : > On 2013-08-30 23:38, Francis Giraldeau wrote : >> We actually >> found a way to insert code inside the probe with code blocks that >> returns a value. Thanks to Simon Marchi for this C trick! > > Well, it turns out that the function save_stack_trace_user() is called > even when the tracepoint is not enabled, so this is a major issue. > Hum... Then why does it work for UST tracepoint macro? By moving the probe custom code inside the macro itself, it's called only when the tracepoint is enabled. The difference is that the UST tracepoint in the C code is a macro that gets expanded, while in the kernel trace_somethig is an actual function call. diff --git a/instrumentation/events/lttng-module/addons.h b/instrumentation/events/lttng-module/addons.h index 8a764b0..26623b3 100644 --- a/instrumentation/events/lttng-module/addons.h +++ b/instrumentation/events/lttng-module/addons.h @@ -200,15 +200,23 @@ TRACE_EVENT(sys_entry, ) TRACE_EVENT(sys_entry_callsite, - TP_PROTO(int id, int len, unsigned long *entries), - TP_ARGS(id, len, entries), + TP_PROTO(int id), + TP_ARGS(id), TP_STRUCT__entry( __field(short, id) - __dynamic_array_hex(unsigned long, callsite, len) + __dynamic_array_hex(unsigned long, callsite, ({ + extern int stack_trace_get_size(void); + int x = stack_trace_get_size(); + x; + })) ), TP_fast_assign( tp_assign(id, id) - tp_memcpy_dyn(callsite, entries) + tp_memcpy_dyn(callsite, ({ + extern unsigned long *stack_trace_get_entries(void); + unsigned long *entries = stack_trace_get_entries(); + entries; + })) ), TP_printk("%d", __entry->id) ) ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-08-31 5:16 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed) -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2013-08-31 3:38 [lttng-dev] [RFC] User space stack trace on system calls Francis Giraldeau 2013-08-31 3:59 ` Francis Giraldeau 2013-08-31 5:16 ` Francis Giraldeau
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox