* [ltt-dev] [UST] Memory usage of markers / tracepoints vs printf
@ 2011-04-01 23:58 Matthew Khouzam
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Matthew Khouzam @ 2011-04-01 23:58 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hello tracers,
I was running some tests today and found that for the same c formatted
string, a marker and a tracepoint will take less memory than printf.
Could anyone comment on this, has it been measured before? I know
performance was tested, but this could be quite interesting as an added
bonus for embedded systems.
Matthew
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2011-04-01 23:58 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2011-04-01 23:58 [ltt-dev] [UST] Memory usage of markers / tracepoints vs printf Matthew Khouzam
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox