Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: ddaney@caviumnetworks.com (David Daney)
Subject: [ltt-dev] Porting "jump labels" to userspace
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 12:17:28 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4D5C30D8.8070107@caviumnetworks.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110216200449.1EB9618020E@magilla.sf.frob.com>

On 02/16/2011 12:04 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
> IMHO there is not really so much to the in-kernel implementation that it's
> worth attempting to reuse the code in userland.  Pretty much all the work
> is in the details of the implementation that would naturally differ a lot
> in a different context.  If you understand the mechanism and the machine
> details, then implementing it well for a userland context is not a big deal
> and is cleaner to do from scratch than shoe-horning kernel-centric code
> into a wildly different context.
>

Good point.

Certainly the details of maintaining instruction cache coherency may be 
different in userspace.

David Daney



  reply	other threads:[~2011-02-16 20:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-02-15 15:53 [ltt-dev] LTTng-UST vs SystemTap userspace tracing benchmarks Julien Desfossez
2011-02-15 16:25 ` William Cohen
2011-02-17 16:20   ` Julien Desfossez
2011-02-15 16:26 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-02-15 16:54   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-15 17:39     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-02-15 22:25       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-15 17:00   ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-02-15 17:04     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-16 10:56     ` Mark Wielaard
2011-02-16 18:50       ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 20:00         ` [ltt-dev] Porting "jump labels" to userspace (was: Re: LTTng-UST vs SystemTap userspace tracing benchmarks) Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-16 20:04           ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 20:17             ` David Daney [this message]
2011-02-16 20:39               ` [ltt-dev] Porting "jump labels" to userspace Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-16 20:45                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-16 21:42                   ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-17 13:58                     ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 20:14           ` David Daney
2011-02-16 20:36             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-16 20:55         ` [ltt-dev] LTTng-UST vs SystemTap userspace tracing benchmarks Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-02-16 21:05           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-16 21:16           ` Mark Wielaard
2011-02-15 17:03 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-02-16 15:30 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-16 18:19   ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-17 17:33   ` Julien Desfossez
2011-02-17 19:11     ` Josh Stone
2011-02-17 19:33       ` Julien Desfossez
2011-02-17 19:47         ` Josh Stone

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4D5C30D8.8070107@caviumnetworks.com \
    --to=ddaney@caviumnetworks.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox