From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Subject: [ltt-dev] Porting "jump labels" to userspace
Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 15:39:53 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110216203953.GB2015@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4D5C30D8.8070107@caviumnetworks.com>
* David Daney (ddaney at caviumnetworks.com) wrote:
> On 02/16/2011 12:04 PM, Roland McGrath wrote:
>> IMHO there is not really so much to the in-kernel implementation that it's
>> worth attempting to reuse the code in userland. Pretty much all the work
>> is in the details of the implementation that would naturally differ a lot
>> in a different context. If you understand the mechanism and the machine
>> details, then implementing it well for a userland context is not a big deal
>> and is cleaner to do from scratch than shoe-horning kernel-centric code
>> into a wildly different context.
>>
>
> Good point.
>
> Certainly the details of maintaining instruction cache coherency may be
> different in userspace.
Indeed, the arch-specific parts will need some extra care (which might, in the
worse case scenario, require to suspend a whole process during the update), but
the generic code in jump_label.c and jump_label.h could certainly be reused.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> David Daney
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-02-16 20:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-02-15 15:53 [ltt-dev] LTTng-UST vs SystemTap userspace tracing benchmarks Julien Desfossez
2011-02-15 16:25 ` William Cohen
2011-02-17 16:20 ` Julien Desfossez
2011-02-15 16:26 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-02-15 16:54 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-15 17:39 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2011-02-15 22:25 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-15 17:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-02-15 17:04 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-16 10:56 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-02-16 18:50 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 20:00 ` [ltt-dev] Porting "jump labels" to userspace (was: Re: LTTng-UST vs SystemTap userspace tracing benchmarks) Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-16 20:04 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-16 20:17 ` [ltt-dev] Porting "jump labels" to userspace David Daney
2011-02-16 20:39 ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2011-02-16 20:45 ` Thomas Gleixner
2011-02-16 21:42 ` Peter Zijlstra
2011-02-17 13:58 ` Ingo Molnar
2011-02-16 20:14 ` David Daney
2011-02-16 20:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-16 20:55 ` [ltt-dev] LTTng-UST vs SystemTap userspace tracing benchmarks Stefan Hajnoczi
2011-02-16 21:05 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-02-16 21:16 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-02-15 17:03 ` Mark Wielaard
2011-02-16 15:30 ` Tom Tromey
2011-02-16 18:19 ` Roland McGrath
2011-02-17 17:33 ` Julien Desfossez
2011-02-17 19:11 ` Josh Stone
2011-02-17 19:33 ` Julien Desfossez
2011-02-17 19:47 ` Josh Stone
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110216203953.GB2015@Krystal \
--to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox