* [ltt-dev] UST test cases refactor
@ 2010-05-25 13:16 Nils Carlson
2010-05-25 15:05 ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Nils Carlson @ 2010-05-25 13:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
I've been looking through the UST test cases and am wondering if it would
be ok to refactor them to use TAP output - Test Anything Protocol. This
would make it much easier to parse output and integrate them into a
test-suite.
Any complaints?
/Nils
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] UST test cases refactor
2010-05-25 13:16 [ltt-dev] UST test cases refactor Nils Carlson
@ 2010-05-25 15:05 ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Pierre-Marc Fournier @ 2010-05-25 15:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
Excellent idea! I would be glad to merge any patch that improves the
test system.
pmf
On 05/25/2010 09:16 AM, Nils Carlson wrote:
> I've been looking through the UST test cases and am wondering if it would
> be ok to refactor them to use TAP output - Test Anything Protocol. This
> would make it much easier to parse output and integrate them into a
> test-suite.
>
> Any complaints?
>
> /Nils
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-05-25 15:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-05-25 13:16 [ltt-dev] UST test cases refactor Nils Carlson
2010-05-25 15:05 ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox