[ltt-dev] Problems with merging patch-2.6.30-rc2-lttng-0.126

[ghaskins@novell.com (Gregory Haskins)]

Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> * Gregory Haskins (ghaskins at novell.com) wrote:
>   
>> Hi all,
>>   I am trying to apply 2.6.30-rc2-lttng-0.126 to a clean 2.6.30-rc2 and
>> I am getting lots of rejects.  I went through one time and resolved all
>> the rejects, but the resulting kernel did trace properly so I perhaps
>> had some fuzz issues.  What kernel base should I be using for this series?
>>
>>     
>
> Hrm, weird, I may have messed up the packaging. I just released LTTng
> 0.127 which should not have such conflicts.
>   
Hi Mathieu,
 I am seeing more or less the same thing with 0.127.  The series has a
ton of conflicts against 30-rc2 and even itself.  Its as if the patches
are based on a different tree. 

Its probably operator error, but I cannot see what I am doing wrong. 
Its the same procedure I have always used to bring your tree in.

Any help appreciated.
-Greg

> Mathieu
>
>   
>> -Greg
>>
>>     
>
>
>
>   
>> _______________________________________________
>> ltt-dev mailing list
>> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
>> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
>>     
>
>
>   


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 266 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20090423/e468896a/attachment-0002.pgp>