Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com (Gui Jianfeng)
Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH v3] lttng: remove ltt root directory if it's no needed
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 10:19:21 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <499CC1A9.4040705@cn.fujitsu.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090219105750.955C.A69D9226@jp.fujitsu.com>

KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>> We have to cleanup the lttng's root directory of debugfs if 
>> there is nobody uses it any more. Because any related lttng
>> modules are unloaded, no need to keep this directory.
>>
>> This patch is based on 2.6.29-rc3-lttng-0.92.
> 
> hmhm. There is one meta question.
> 
> Why do we need ltt-control unloadability?
> We expect merge lttng into mainline in nearly future.
> 
> At that time, Who need ltt core kernel module (not any specific probe).
> 
> IOW, why ca't we do following?
> 
> 
> config LTT_TRACE_CONTROL
> -        tristate "Linux Trace Toolkit Trace Controller"
> +        bool "Linux Trace Toolkit Trace Controller"
>         depends on LTT_TRACER
>         default m
>         help
>           If you enable this option, the debugfs-based Linux Trace Toolkit Trace
>           Controller will be either built in the kernel or as module.

  That sounds reasonalbe. :)
  I guess this mainly because there are multiple ways to do ltt controling.
  We can do it through debugfs interface, also the netlink interface is still
  available. But I think the netlink interface is not needed anymore by now, 
  can be removed...

> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

-- 
Regards
Gui Jianfeng





  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-19  2:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-18  8:16 [ltt-dev] [PATCH] " Gui Jianfeng
2009-02-18  8:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-18  9:00   ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-02-18 11:50   ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH v2] " Gui Jianfeng
2009-02-18 23:50     ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-19  1:16       ` Gui Jianfeng
2009-02-19  1:39         ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH v3] " Gui Jianfeng
2009-02-19  2:02           ` KOSAKI Motohiro
2009-02-19  2:19             ` Gui Jianfeng [this message]
2009-02-19  2:38             ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-19  3:14           ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=499CC1A9.4040705@cn.fujitsu.com \
    --to=guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox