Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: dwt@PolTec.COM (Dennis W. Tokarski)
Subject: [ltt-dev] too few arguments to function 'ltt_vtrace'
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2009 13:40:51 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4974C933.8040408@PolTec.COM> (raw)

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi Matthieu,

I've just tried to build a kernel based on Fedora's
kernel-2.6.27.9-150.fc10.src.rpm. Your patch set from
patch-2.6.27.9-lttng-0.70.tar.bz2 applied with minimal
conflicts which were easily resolved.

However the error message in the subject above occurs
during build.

In ltt_serialize.c, ltt_vtrace() is defined as requiring
five arguments, while in ltt-ftrace.c ltt_tap_marker()
calls it with four--you aren't providing the required
pointer to a struct marker as the first arg. It's not
at all clear from the surrounding code what ltt_tap_marker()
*should* be passing, but ltt_vtrace() certainly wants to
use the arg.

Same deal with is_marker_enabled() in kernel/marker.c,
you call it from markers_show() in fs/proc/base.c without
the first arg.

A quick look at your web repository shows the second
bug fixed, but the first is still present in the
head revision.

So how do you get a kernel to build at all, much less
run and actually take a trace?  What actual revisions
are you using for your work?

I'd really like to give lttng a try, but there is
this little show-stopper.

Thanks for your help!
- --Dennis

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFJdMkrDJucIzCImrURAg/SAJ98BwoJPl1gfOWVZJI8b90o6zS5UQCdGLz/
9JN1AdEXEQkNn89HBpLykeY=
=c3cJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




             reply	other threads:[~2009-01-19 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-01-19 18:40 Dennis W. Tokarski [this message]
2009-01-20  2:46 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-01-20  3:14   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-02-01  3:50     ` Dennis W. Tokarski

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4974C933.8040408@PolTec.COM \
    --to=dwt@poltec.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox