* [ltt-dev] LTT satus
@ 2008-10-01 18:27 barbalace
2008-10-01 18:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: barbalace @ 2008-10-01 18:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
Dear LTT team,
I'm involved in the activity of using LTTng to trace RTAI. RTAI has an
old support of LTT but this is a don't care issue. The problem is that
I've not a clear idea of how LTTng work. My basic question is: what is
the difference between Facilities and Markers? Are both still in use?
I'm currently work with probably not a brand new version of LTTng: the
last one that patch linux kernel 2.6.19...
Thanks a lot
- Antonio Barbalace
Istituto Gas Ionizzati del CNR
Consorzio RFX - Associazione EURATOM/ENEA sulla Fusione
Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35127 Padova - Italy
mailto:barbalace at igi.cnr.it, http://www.igi.cnr.it
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] LTT satus
2008-10-01 18:27 [ltt-dev] LTT satus barbalace
@ 2008-10-01 18:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2008-10-01 18:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
Hi,
Facilities are gone long ago. They used a XML description for events
which turned into C code using genevent, a C code generator. It was
rather hellish to keep in sync the kernel code with the XML
descriptions.
The markers are an in-kernel API (see include/linux/marker.h and
Documentation/markers.txt) which lets you describe your events in the C
code. The typing is expressed using a format string. It's automatically
saved in the trace at trace start/module load, so you don't have to take
care of such details by yourself : the meta information about events is
automatically exported through the trace.
Mathieu
* barbalace at igi.cnr.it (barbalace at igi.cnr.it) wrote:
> Dear LTT team,
> I'm involved in the activity of using LTTng to trace RTAI. RTAI has an old
> support of LTT but this is a don't care issue. The problem is that I've not
> a clear idea of how LTTng work. My basic question is: what is the
> difference between Facilities and Markers? Are both still in use?
> I'm currently work with probably not a brand new version of LTTng: the last
> one that patch linux kernel 2.6.19...
>
> Thanks a lot
>
> - Antonio Barbalace
>
> Istituto Gas Ionizzati del CNR
> Consorzio RFX - Associazione EURATOM/ENEA sulla Fusione
> Corso Stati Uniti 4, 35127 Padova - Italy
> mailto:barbalace at igi.cnr.it, http://www.igi.cnr.it
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
>
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2008-10-01 18:37 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2008-10-01 18:27 [ltt-dev] LTT satus barbalace
2008-10-01 18:37 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox