[lttng-dev] querying bt_ctf_integer_base via babeltrace 1.x

[lttng-dev] querying bt_ctf_integer_base via babeltrace 1.x

[Milian Wolff]

Hey all,

apparently it's not possible to query the integer base via babeltrace 1.x. 
There is only `bt_ctf_integer_base` in `ctf-ir/field-types.h`, and there it's 
only used for `bt_ctf_field_type_integer_set_base`. Apparently, there is no 
equivalent getter for it.

Can one be added please?

Thanks
-- 
Milian Wolff | milian.wolff at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 3826 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20190430/2cadd4b1/attachment.bin>

[lttng-dev] querying bt_ctf_integer_base via babeltrace 1.x

[Jonathan Rajotte-Julien]

Hi Milian,

On Tue, Apr 30, 2019 at 05:16:44PM +0200, Milian Wolff via lttng-dev wrote:
> Hey all,
> 
> apparently it's not possible to query the integer base via babeltrace 1.x. 
> There is only `bt_ctf_integer_base` in `ctf-ir/field-types.h`, and there it's 
> only used for `bt_ctf_field_type_integer_set_base`. Apparently, there is no 
> equivalent getter for it.

Our current bandwidth is focused on Babeltrace 2. I know that we have
been saying that for a long time but sometime things are just more complicated
than planned.

Still, I encourage you to propose a patch for this. It will lower the effort
necessary on our side.

Cheers

> 
> Can one be added please?
> 
> Thanks
> -- 
> Milian Wolff | milian.wolff at kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer
> KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH, a KDAB Group company
> Tel: +49-30-521325470
> KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts



> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> https://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev


-- 
Jonathan Rajotte-Julien
EfficiOS