From: jbernard@debian.org (Jon Bernard)
Subject: [lttng-dev] lttng-tools package version out of sync in debian testing/sid
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:28:21 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160421162754.GA12414@angus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <575554471.65774.1461247280368.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>
* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
>
> (CCing the ftpmaster team in case they can help us solve the situation)
>
> I am an upstream maintainer of the LTTng project (http://lttng.org).
>
> It appears that lttng-tools is currently out of sync with lttng-ust and
> lttng-modules in Debian and sid (unstable), and missing in Debian stretch
> (testing). It appears that this situation has been ongoing for a while.
>
> The following search: https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=names&keywords=lttng
> shows the situation:
>
> - sid (unstable):
>
> lttng-ust* : 2.7.2-1
> lttng-modules* : 2.7.2-1
> lttng-tools: 2.6.0-1ppc64el1
> liblttng-ctl0: 2.6.0-1ppc64el1
> liblttng-ctl-dev: 2.6.0-1ppc64el1
>
> - stretch (testing):
>
> lttng-ust* : 2.7.2-1
> lttng-modules* : 2.7.2-1
> lttng-tools: <none>
> liblttng-ctl0: <none>
> liblttng-ctl-dev: <none>
>
> In the currently situation, users need to build lttng-tools from source
> to use lttng-ust and lttng-modules on Debian testing/sid, which defeats
> the purpose of distribution packages.
>
> What can we do, as upstream, to help solve this packaging issue ?
I should have this resolved within a few days. There was a prolonged
delay in the NEW queue for lttng-tools which caused the other dependent
package to block. A rejection was eventually issued, but for some
reason I did not receive the notification - which could be my fault, I'm
not sure. Either way, I'm about upload new packages which should
resolve the ftp-master concerns and things should unblock shortly. I
must thank Michael Jeanson, he's been very helpful in preparing these
updates we should have this all fixed up very soon.
--
Jon
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-21 16:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-21 14:01 Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-21 16:28 ` Jon Bernard [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160421162754.GA12414@angus \
--to=jbernard@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox