Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: jbernard@debian.org (Jon Bernard)
Subject: [lttng-dev] lttng-tools package version out of sync in debian testing/sid
Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2016 12:28:21 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160421162754.GA12414@angus> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <575554471.65774.1461247280368.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com>

* Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote:
> Hi Jon,
> 
> (CCing the ftpmaster team in case they can help us solve the situation)
> 
> I am an upstream maintainer of the LTTng project (http://lttng.org).
> 
> It appears that lttng-tools is currently out of sync with lttng-ust and
> lttng-modules in Debian and sid (unstable), and missing in Debian stretch
> (testing). It appears that this situation has been ongoing for a while.
> 
> The following search: https://packages.debian.org/search?searchon=names&keywords=lttng
> shows the situation:
> 
> - sid (unstable):
> 
> lttng-ust* : 2.7.2-1
> lttng-modules* : 2.7.2-1
> lttng-tools: 2.6.0-1ppc64el1
> liblttng-ctl0: 2.6.0-1ppc64el1
> liblttng-ctl-dev: 2.6.0-1ppc64el1
> 
> - stretch (testing):
> 
> lttng-ust* : 2.7.2-1
> lttng-modules* : 2.7.2-1
> lttng-tools: <none>
> liblttng-ctl0: <none>
> liblttng-ctl-dev: <none>
> 
> In the currently situation, users need to build lttng-tools from source
> to use lttng-ust and lttng-modules on Debian testing/sid, which defeats
> the purpose of distribution packages.
> 
> What can we do, as upstream, to help solve this packaging issue ?

I should have this resolved within a few days.  There was a prolonged
delay in the NEW queue for lttng-tools which caused the other dependent
package to block.  A rejection was eventually issued, but for some
reason I did not receive the notification - which could be my fault, I'm
not sure.  Either way, I'm about upload new packages which should
resolve the ftp-master concerns and things should unblock shortly.  I
must thank Michael Jeanson, he's been very helpful in preparing these
updates we should have this all fixed up very soon.

-- 
Jon


      reply	other threads:[~2016-04-21 16:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-21 14:01 Mathieu Desnoyers
2016-04-21 16:28 ` Jon Bernard [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160421162754.GA12414@angus \
    --to=jbernard@debian.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox