* [lttng-dev] Sync instrumentation to today's linux 3.8
@ 2013-01-25 22:10 Francis Giraldeau
2013-01-28 16:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Francis Giraldeau @ 2013-01-25 22:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To prepare instrumentation for the next linux release, here is the ticket I
was working on. It's mostly straight forward.
http://redmine.dorsal.polymtl.ca/issues/431
There is one issue with ext4 includes. I had to copy fs/ext4/ext4.h and
ext4_extent.h for the function ext4_ext_get_actual_len(). I added them to
instrumentation/mainline/fs/ext4 directory. I'm not sure if it's the best
solution.
Still testing to do, thought. BTW, is there a test setup for regression? I
would like to verify that it doesn't break any supported kernel and I don't
have the required setup.
With this, maybe lttng-modules 2.1 can target linux 3.8?
Cheers,
Francis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.lttng.org/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20130125/35d5d659/attachment.html>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [lttng-dev] Sync instrumentation to today's linux 3.8
2013-01-25 22:10 [lttng-dev] Sync instrumentation to today's linux 3.8 Francis Giraldeau
@ 2013-01-28 16:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-01-28 16:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2013-01-28 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
* Francis Giraldeau (francis.giraldeau at gmail.com) wrote:
> To prepare instrumentation for the next linux release, here is the ticket I
> was working on. It's mostly straight forward.
>
> http://redmine.dorsal.polymtl.ca/issues/431
>
> There is one issue with ext4 includes. I had to copy fs/ext4/ext4.h and
> ext4_extent.h for the function ext4_ext_get_actual_len(). I added them to
> instrumentation/mainline/fs/ext4 directory. I'm not sure if it's the best
> solution.
>
> Still testing to do, thought. BTW, is there a test setup for regression? I
> would like to verify that it doesn't break any supported kernel and I don't
> have the required setup.
>
> With this, maybe lttng-modules 2.1 can target linux 3.8?
Please send the patch by email.
3.8 is still in rc stage. Removing ext4_ext_get_actual_len() seems like
a bad move from upstream Linux if it is needed in the instrumentation
headers. This should be fixed upstream rather than duplicated within our
own code.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Cheers,
>
> Francis
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
* [lttng-dev] Sync instrumentation to today's linux 3.8
2013-01-28 16:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
@ 2013-01-28 16:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2013-01-28 16:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
* Mathieu Desnoyers (mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com) wrote:
> * Francis Giraldeau (francis.giraldeau at gmail.com) wrote:
> > To prepare instrumentation for the next linux release, here is the ticket I
> > was working on. It's mostly straight forward.
> >
> > http://redmine.dorsal.polymtl.ca/issues/431
> >
> > There is one issue with ext4 includes. I had to copy fs/ext4/ext4.h and
> > ext4_extent.h for the function ext4_ext_get_actual_len(). I added them to
> > instrumentation/mainline/fs/ext4 directory. I'm not sure if it's the best
> > solution.
> >
> > Still testing to do, thought. BTW, is there a test setup for regression? I
> > would like to verify that it doesn't break any supported kernel and I don't
> > have the required setup.
> >
> > With this, maybe lttng-modules 2.1 can target linux 3.8?
And FYI, ext4 tracepoints are only in lttng-modules master branch. They
were excluded from 2.1.x because they arrived too late in the 2.1 cycle.
Thanks,
Mathieu
>
> Please send the patch by email.
>
> 3.8 is still in rc stage. Removing ext4_ext_get_actual_len() seems like
> a bad move from upstream Linux if it is needed in the instrumentation
> headers. This should be fixed upstream rather than duplicated within our
> own code.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mathieu
>
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Francis
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > lttng-dev mailing list
> > lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> > http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
>
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> EfficiOS Inc.
> http://www.efficios.com
>
> _______________________________________________
> lttng-dev mailing list
> lttng-dev at lists.lttng.org
> http://lists.lttng.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/lttng-dev
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2013-01-28 16:19 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2013-01-25 22:10 [lttng-dev] Sync instrumentation to today's linux 3.8 Francis Giraldeau
2013-01-28 16:15 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2013-01-28 16:19 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox