Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com (Mathieu Desnoyers)
Subject: [ltt-dev] [PATCH 3/7] rculfhash: make cds_lfht_lookup() more generic
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 13:23:37 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111102172336.GC32359@Krystal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <9518e81f5aee8dee44154d98ff5a183ee6a12689.1320217693.git.laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>

* Lai Jiangshan (laijs at cn.fujitsu.com) wrote:
> We use hash value to determine the range of the object
> and use cds_lfht_lookup_fct to lookup them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Lai Jiangshan <laijs at cn.fujitsu.com>
> ---
>  rculfhash.c            |    8 ++++----
>  tests/test_urcu_hash.c |   25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  urcu/rculfhash.h       |    4 +++-
>  3 files changed, 29 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/rculfhash.c b/rculfhash.c
> index d1a1766..29054cd 100644
> --- a/rculfhash.c
> +++ b/rculfhash.c
> @@ -1391,14 +1391,14 @@ struct cds_lfht *_cds_lfht_new(cds_lfht_hash_fct hash_fct,
>  	return ht;
>  }
>  
> -void cds_lfht_lookup(struct cds_lfht *ht, void *key, size_t key_len,
> +void cds_lfht_lookup(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long hash,
> +		cds_lfht_lookup_fct match, void *arg,

arg -> key ?

for "match", our approach is to provide this function as parameter to
cds_lfht_new rather than pass it as parameter each time a lookup is
performed. What is the reason why we should pass it here as a parameter?

Thanks,

Mathieu

>  		struct cds_lfht_iter *iter)
>  {
>  	struct cds_lfht_node *node, *next, *dummy_node;
>  	struct _cds_lfht_node *lookup;
> -	unsigned long hash, reverse_hash, size;
> +	unsigned long reverse_hash, size;
>  
> -	hash = ht->hash_fct(key, key_len, ht->hash_seed);
>  	reverse_hash = bit_reverse_ulong(hash);
>  
>  	size = rcu_dereference(ht->t.size);
> @@ -1421,7 +1421,7 @@ void cds_lfht_lookup(struct cds_lfht *ht, void *key, size_t key_len,
>  		if (caa_likely(!is_removed(next))
>  		    && !is_dummy(next)
>  		    && node->p.reverse_hash == reverse_hash
> -		    && caa_likely(!ht->compare_fct(node->key, node->key_len, key, key_len))) {
> +		    && caa_likely(match(node, arg))) {
>  				break;
>  		}
>  		node = clear_flag(next);
> diff --git a/tests/test_urcu_hash.c b/tests/test_urcu_hash.c
> index e28c14a..4c45573 100644
> --- a/tests/test_urcu_hash.c
> +++ b/tests/test_urcu_hash.c
> @@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
>  #define DEFAULT_MIN_ALLOC_SIZE	1
>  #define DEFAULT_RAND_POOL	1000000
>  
> +#define TEST_HASH_SEED	0x42UL
> +
>  /* Make this big enough to include the POWER5+ L3 cacheline size of 256B */
>  #define CACHE_LINE_SIZE 4096
>  
> @@ -419,6 +421,23 @@ unsigned long test_compare(void *key1, size_t key1_len,
>  		return 1;
>  }
>  
> +static
> +int test_match(struct cds_lfht_node *node, void *arg)
> +{
> +	return !test_compare(node->key, node->key_len,
> +			arg, sizeof(unsigned long));
> +}
> +
> +static
> +void cds_lfht_test_lookup(struct cds_lfht *ht, void *key, size_t key_len,
> +		struct cds_lfht_iter *iter)
> +{
> +	assert(key_len == sizeof(unsigned long));
> +
> +	cds_lfht_lookup(ht, test_hash(key, key_len, TEST_HASH_SEED),
> +			test_match, key, iter);
> +}
> +
>  void *thr_count(void *arg)
>  {
>  	printf_verbose("thread_begin %s, thread id : %lx, tid %lu\n",
> @@ -479,7 +498,7 @@ void *thr_reader(void *_count)
>  
>  	for (;;) {
>  		rcu_read_lock();
> -		cds_lfht_lookup(test_ht,
> +		cds_lfht_test_lookup(test_ht,
>  			(void *)(((unsigned long) rand_r(&rand_lookup) % lookup_pool_size) + lookup_pool_offset),
>  			sizeof(void *), &iter);
>  		node = cds_lfht_iter_get_test_node(&iter);
> @@ -574,7 +593,7 @@ void *thr_writer(void *_count)
>  		} else {
>  			/* May delete */
>  			rcu_read_lock();
> -			cds_lfht_lookup(test_ht,
> +			cds_lfht_test_lookup(test_ht,
>  				(void *)(((unsigned long) rand_r(&rand_lookup) % write_pool_size) + write_pool_offset),
>  				sizeof(void *), &iter);
>  			ret = cds_lfht_del(test_ht, &iter);
> @@ -932,7 +951,7 @@ int main(int argc, char **argv)
>  	 * thread from the point of view of resize.
>  	 */
>  	rcu_register_thread();
> -	test_ht = cds_lfht_new(test_hash, test_compare, 0x42UL,
> +	test_ht = cds_lfht_new(test_hash, test_compare, TEST_HASH_SEED,
>  			init_hash_size, min_hash_alloc_size,
>  			(opt_auto_resize ? CDS_LFHT_AUTO_RESIZE : 0) |
>  			CDS_LFHT_ACCOUNTING, NULL);
> diff --git a/urcu/rculfhash.h b/urcu/rculfhash.h
> index f4f3373..b56fe56 100644
> --- a/urcu/rculfhash.h
> +++ b/urcu/rculfhash.h
> @@ -86,6 +86,7 @@ typedef unsigned long (*cds_lfht_hash_fct)(void *key, size_t length,
>  					unsigned long seed);
>  typedef unsigned long (*cds_lfht_compare_fct)(void *key1, size_t key1_len,
>  					void *key2, size_t key2_len);
> +typedef int (*cds_lfht_lookup_fct)(struct cds_lfht_node *node, void *arg);
>  
>  /*
>   * cds_lfht_node_init - initialize a hash table node
> @@ -203,7 +204,8 @@ void cds_lfht_count_nodes(struct cds_lfht *ht,
>   * Call with rcu_read_lock held.
>   * Threads calling this API need to be registered RCU read-side threads.
>   */
> -void cds_lfht_lookup(struct cds_lfht *ht, void *key, size_t key_len,
> +void cds_lfht_lookup(struct cds_lfht *ht, unsigned long hash,
> +		cds_lfht_lookup_fct match, void *arg,
>  		struct cds_lfht_iter *iter);
>  
>  /*
> -- 
> 1.7.4.4
> 

-- 
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com




  reply	other threads:[~2011-11-02 17:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-02  7:50 [ltt-dev] [PATCH 0/7] rculfhash: More proper APIs and struct cds_lfht_node Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-02  7:50 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/7] rculfhash, test: wrap " Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-02 17:16   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-02  7:50 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 2/7] rculfhash: Move "struct rcu_head head" out of "struct cds_lfht_node" Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-02 17:18   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-02  7:50 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 3/7] rculfhash: make cds_lfht_lookup() more generic Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-02 17:23   ` Mathieu Desnoyers [this message]
2011-11-03 14:07     ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-04 10:08       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-04 13:15         ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-04 13:53           ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-04 15:01             ` Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-05 13:08               ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-02  7:50 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 4/7] rculfhash: Comparision API use node pointer instead of key Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-05 13:10   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-02  7:50 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 5/7] rculfhash: Pass hash value to cds_lfht_add* APIs Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-05 13:10   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-02  7:50 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 6/7] rculfhash: Move key out of struct lfht_test_node Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-05 13:12   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-05 13:42   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-05 13:52   ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-02  7:50 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 7/7] rculfhash: cleanup struct _cds_lfht_node Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-04  7:47   ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/2] rculfhash: rename dummy to bucket Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-04  7:47     ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 2/2] rculfhash: simplify BUCKET_FLAG tracking Lai Jiangshan
2011-11-05 14:07       ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2011-11-05 13:54     ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/2] rculfhash: rename dummy to bucket Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111102172336.GC32359@Krystal \
    --to=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox