[ltt-dev] Fedora packaging

[ltt-dev] Fedora packaging

[Francis Giraldeau]

Hi,

Packaging for Ubuntu is very nice, is there any up to date RPMs for Fedora
users?

Cheer,

Francis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20110615/a3fe5a95/attachment-0002.htm>

[ltt-dev] Fedora packaging

[Francis Giraldeau]

Hi,

Packaging for Ubuntu is very nice, is there any up to date RPMs for Fedora
users?

Cheer,

Francis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/ltt-dev/attachments/20110615/a3fe5a95/attachment.htm>

[ltt-dev] Fedora packaging

[Francis Giraldeau]

Hi,

Packaging for Ubuntu is very nice, is there any up to date RPMs for Fedora
users?

Cheer,

Francis
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20110615/a3fe5a95/attachment-0003.htm>

[ltt-dev] Fedora packaging

[Yannick Brosseau]

Hello,

I'm currently working on it. I should have the latest release of UST in
the next 24 hours.
Userspace tool of lttng will follow....

I've done the previous release of UST and URCU:
http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/

On 2011-06-14 14:51, Francis Giraldeau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Packaging for Ubuntu is very nice, is there any up to date RPMs for
> Fedora users?
>
> Cheer,
>
> Francis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20110614/cdffc306/attachment-0002.htm>

[ltt-dev] Fedora packaging

[Yannick Brosseau]

Hello,

I'm currently working on it. I should have the latest release of UST in
the next 24 hours.
Userspace tool of lttng will follow....

I've done the previous release of UST and URCU:
http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/

On 2011-06-14 14:51, Francis Giraldeau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Packaging for Ubuntu is very nice, is there any up to date RPMs for
> Fedora users?
>
> Cheer,
>
> Francis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/ltt-dev/attachments/20110614/cdffc306/attachment.htm>

[ltt-dev] Fedora packaging

[Yannick Brosseau]

Hello,

I'm currently working on it. I should have the latest release of UST in
the next 24 hours.
Userspace tool of lttng will follow....

I've done the previous release of UST and URCU:
http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/

On 2011-06-14 14:51, Francis Giraldeau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Packaging for Ubuntu is very nice, is there any up to date RPMs for
> Fedora users?
>
> Cheer,
>
> Francis
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20110614/cdffc306/attachment-0003.htm>

[ltt-dev] Fedora packaging

[Yannick Brosseau]

On 2011-06-14 14:51, Francis Giraldeau wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Packaging for Ubuntu is very nice, is there any up to date RPMs for
> Fedora users?

Follow-up on yesterday, RPMs for fedora for the latest liburcu and ust
are available
(http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/)
For x86_64 and i686.

Yannick

[ltt-dev] Fedora packaging

[Josh Stone]

On 06/15/2011 01:48 PM, Yannick Brosseau wrote:
> Follow-up on yesterday, RPMs for fedora for the latest liburcu and ust
> are available
> (http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/)
> For x86_64 and i686.

Have you considered making these proper Fedora packages?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_Maintainers#Get_Involved

[ltt-dev] Fedora packaging

[Yannick Brosseau]

On 2011-06-15 17:13, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 01:48 PM, Yannick Brosseau wrote:
>> Follow-up on yesterday, RPMs for fedora for the latest liburcu and ust
>> are available
>> (http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/)
>> or x86_64 and i686.
> Have you considered making these proper Fedora packages?
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_Maintainers#Get_Involved
Yes, that's the plan.  And any help from experienced Fedora packagers
would be welcome.

[ltt-dev] Fedora packaging

[William Cohen]

On 06/15/2011 05:13 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 06/15/2011 01:48 PM, Yannick Brosseau wrote:
>> Follow-up on yesterday, RPMs for fedora for the latest liburcu and ust
>> are available
>> (http://www.dorsal.polymtl.ca/~ybrosseau/fedora/)
>> For x86_64 and i686.
> 
> Have you considered making these proper Fedora packages?
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Package_Maintainers#Get_Involved
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ltt-dev mailing list
> ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev

Hi Josh,

It would be good to get the packages reviewed and in a state they are proper fedora packages.

I gave some feedback on the UST spec file last week and those changes have been incorporated into the ust srpm. 

-Will

[ltt-dev] Fedora packaging

[Yannick Brosseau]

> Hi Josh,
>
> It would be good to get the packages reviewed and in a state they are proper fedora packages.
>
> I gave some feedback on the UST spec file last week and those changes have been incorporated into the ust srpm. 

I've posted Package reviews for liburcu, UST and LTTV:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717337
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717748
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=717750

Yannick