* [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] UST synchronization fix
@ 2010-08-11 14:13 Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <AANLkTikd7wEY7YciqxgzWFbC7wLi1quZpJPhRwr69StT@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-16 4:48 ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2010-08-11 14:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
Missing smp_wmb() at subbuffer switch.
Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com>
---
git/ust/libust/buffers.c | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Index: ust/libust/buffers.c
===================================================================
--- ust/libust/buffers.c 2010-08-10 16:16:39.000000000 -0400
+++ ust/libust/buffers.c 2010-08-10 16:19:59.000000000 -0400
@@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_switch_old_subbu
* This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the IPI
* sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb().
*/
- barrier();
+ smp_wmb();
uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[oldidx].cc, padding_size);
commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[oldidx].cc);
ltt_check_deliver(chan, buf, offsets->old - 1, commit_count, oldidx);
@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_switch_new_subbu
* This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the IPI
* sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb().
*/
- barrier();
+ smp_wmb();
uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[beginidx].cc, ltt_subbuffer_header_size());
commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[beginidx].cc);
/* Check if the written buffer has to be delivered */
@@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_end_switch_curre
* This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the IPI
* sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb().
*/
- barrier();
+ smp_wmb();
uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[endidx].cc, padding_size);
commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[endidx].cc);
ltt_check_deliver(chan, buf,
--
Mathieu Desnoyers
Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant
EfficiOS Inc.
http://www.efficios.com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread[parent not found: <AANLkTikd7wEY7YciqxgzWFbC7wLi1quZpJPhRwr69StT@mail.gmail.com>]
[parent not found: <20100811155627.GA24570@Krystal>]
[parent not found: <AANLkTimWD+taSsqrCR+O4gFT=qdPfmYFYgkYohn6pWj+@mail.gmail.com>]
* [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] UST synchronization fix [not found] ` <AANLkTimWD+taSsqrCR+O4gFT=qdPfmYFYgkYohn6pWj+@mail.gmail.com> @ 2010-08-12 18:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2010-08-12 18:42 UTC (permalink / raw) Oh, Sh*t..... I found the underlying problem. in lttv: ltt/marker.c marker_update_fields_offsets() updates the marker info offset value, which affects the offset for the marker for the whole trace. However, this information should stay valid as long as the event is "current" in a given tracefile. So the problem we have here is that we have the same marker twice in two threads, with one tracefile per thread. The offsets gets corrupted by events read from the other thread while we have the first thread read traceset middle reading the event at the lowest level and the event eventually dispatched (in order) to the text dump module. I'll look into this and come back with a fix. Thanks, Mathieu * chris meyers (chris.meyers.fsu at gmail.com) wrote: > I can still invoke the problem with the modified test case that you sent me. > It works flawlessly without the sleeps, but when I put the sleeps back in > it garbles the output. Did it run OK with the sleeps in for you? > > -Chris > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers < > mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote: > > > No. But the test-case was incorrect: the string input was concurrently > > modified > > by the 2 threads. I'm preparing modifications to string handling to be more > > robust (so the trace does not become unreadable). > > > Ahh, my bad. That was a mistake to have the different threads modifying the > same string. Thanks for the fixed version. > > > > > In your original problem, did you have another event that was trying to > > save > > concurrently modified strings into the trace buffers ? > > > No > > > > > It's a 2-pass algo: one pass for strlen, 2nd pass doing a memcpy of the > > string. > > If it gets modified concurrently, then bad things happen. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Mathieu > > > > * chris meyers (chris.meyers.fsu at gmail.com) wrote: > > > Did this fix solve the multi-threaded test case for you? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > -Chris > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers < > > > mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Missing smp_wmb() at subbuffer switch. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> > > > > --- > > > > git/ust/libust/buffers.c | 6 +++--- > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > Index: ust/libust/buffers.c > > > > =================================================================== > > > > --- ust/libust/buffers.c 2010-08-10 16:16:39.000000000 -0400 > > > > +++ ust/libust/buffers.c 2010-08-10 16:19:59.000000000 -0400 > > > > @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_switch_old_subbu > > > > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the IPI > > > > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > > > > */ > > > > - barrier(); > > > > + smp_wmb(); > > > > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[oldidx].cc, padding_size); > > > > commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[oldidx].cc); > > > > ltt_check_deliver(chan, buf, offsets->old - 1, commit_count, > > > > oldidx); > > > > @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_switch_new_subbu > > > > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the IPI > > > > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > > > > */ > > > > - barrier(); > > > > + smp_wmb(); > > > > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[beginidx].cc, > > > > ltt_subbuffer_header_size()); > > > > commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[beginidx].cc); > > > > /* Check if the written buffer has to be delivered */ > > > > @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_end_switch_curre > > > > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the IPI > > > > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > > > > */ > > > > - barrier(); > > > > + smp_wmb(); > > > > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[endidx].cc, padding_size); > > > > commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[endidx].cc); > > > > ltt_check_deliver(chan, buf, > > > > -- > > > > Mathieu Desnoyers > > > > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > > > > EfficiOS Inc. > > > > http://www.efficios.com > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > ltt-dev mailing list > > > > ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca > > > > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev > > > > > > > > -- > > Mathieu Desnoyers > > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > > EfficiOS Inc. > > http://www.efficios.com > > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] UST synchronization fix 2010-08-12 18:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers 2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers 2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: chris meyers @ 2010-08-12 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw) Awesome! It felt like the marker didn't match up with the data somehow. Thanks for working on this problem! -Chris On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers < mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote: > Oh, Sh*t..... I found the underlying problem. > > in lttv: > ltt/marker.c > > marker_update_fields_offsets() updates the marker info offset value, which > affects the offset for the marker for the whole trace. However, this > information > should stay valid as long as the event is "current" in a given tracefile. > > So the problem we have here is that we have the same marker twice in two > threads, with one tracefile per thread. The offsets gets corrupted by > events > read from the other thread while we have the first thread read traceset > middle > reading the event at the lowest level and the event eventually dispatched > (in > order) to the text dump module. > > I'll look into this and come back with a fix. > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > * chris meyers (chris.meyers.fsu at gmail.com) wrote: > > I can still invoke the problem with the modified test case that you sent > me. > > It works flawlessly without the sleeps, but when I put the sleeps back > in > > it garbles the output. Did it run OK with the sleeps in for you? > > > > -Chris > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers < > > mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote: > > > > > No. But the test-case was incorrect: the string input was concurrently > > > modified > > > by the 2 threads. I'm preparing modifications to string handling to be > more > > > robust (so the trace does not become unreadable). > > > > > Ahh, my bad. That was a mistake to have the different threads modifying > the > > same string. Thanks for the fixed version. > > > > > > > > In your original problem, did you have another event that was trying to > > > save > > > concurrently modified strings into the trace buffers ? > > > > > No > > > > > > > > It's a 2-pass algo: one pass for strlen, 2nd pass doing a memcpy of the > > > string. > > > If it gets modified concurrently, then bad things happen. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Mathieu > > > > > > * chris meyers (chris.meyers.fsu at gmail.com) wrote: > > > > Did this fix solve the multi-threaded test case for you? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Chris > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers < > > > > mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Missing smp_wmb() at subbuffer switch. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > git/ust/libust/buffers.c | 6 +++--- > > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > Index: ust/libust/buffers.c > > > > > =================================================================== > > > > > --- ust/libust/buffers.c 2010-08-10 16:16:39.000000000 -0400 > > > > > +++ ust/libust/buffers.c 2010-08-10 16:19:59.000000000 -0400 > > > > > @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_switch_old_subbu > > > > > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the > IPI > > > > > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > > > > > */ > > > > > - barrier(); > > > > > + smp_wmb(); > > > > > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[oldidx].cc, padding_size); > > > > > commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[oldidx].cc); > > > > > ltt_check_deliver(chan, buf, offsets->old - 1, commit_count, > > > > > oldidx); > > > > > @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_switch_new_subbu > > > > > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the > IPI > > > > > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > > > > > */ > > > > > - barrier(); > > > > > + smp_wmb(); > > > > > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[beginidx].cc, > > > > > ltt_subbuffer_header_size()); > > > > > commit_count = > uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[beginidx].cc); > > > > > /* Check if the written buffer has to be delivered */ > > > > > @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_end_switch_curre > > > > > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the > IPI > > > > > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > > > > > */ > > > > > - barrier(); > > > > > + smp_wmb(); > > > > > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[endidx].cc, padding_size); > > > > > commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[endidx].cc); > > > > > ltt_check_deliver(chan, buf, > > > > > -- > > > > > Mathieu Desnoyers > > > > > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > > > > > EfficiOS Inc. > > > > > http://www.efficios.com > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > ltt-dev mailing list > > > > > ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca > > > > > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Mathieu Desnoyers > > > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > > > EfficiOS Inc. > > > http://www.efficios.com > > > > > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20100812/5d843675/attachment-0002.htm> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] UST synchronization fix 2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers @ 2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers 2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: chris meyers @ 2010-08-12 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw) Awesome! It felt like the marker didn't match up with the data somehow. Thanks for working on this problem! -Chris On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers < mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote: > Oh, Sh*t..... I found the underlying problem. > > in lttv: > ltt/marker.c > > marker_update_fields_offsets() updates the marker info offset value, which > affects the offset for the marker for the whole trace. However, this > information > should stay valid as long as the event is "current" in a given tracefile. > > So the problem we have here is that we have the same marker twice in two > threads, with one tracefile per thread. The offsets gets corrupted by > events > read from the other thread while we have the first thread read traceset > middle > reading the event at the lowest level and the event eventually dispatched > (in > order) to the text dump module. > > I'll look into this and come back with a fix. > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > * chris meyers (chris.meyers.fsu at gmail.com) wrote: > > I can still invoke the problem with the modified test case that you sent > me. > > It works flawlessly without the sleeps, but when I put the sleeps back > in > > it garbles the output. Did it run OK with the sleeps in for you? > > > > -Chris > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers < > > mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote: > > > > > No. But the test-case was incorrect: the string input was concurrently > > > modified > > > by the 2 threads. I'm preparing modifications to string handling to be > more > > > robust (so the trace does not become unreadable). > > > > > Ahh, my bad. That was a mistake to have the different threads modifying > the > > same string. Thanks for the fixed version. > > > > > > > > In your original problem, did you have another event that was trying to > > > save > > > concurrently modified strings into the trace buffers ? > > > > > No > > > > > > > > It's a 2-pass algo: one pass for strlen, 2nd pass doing a memcpy of the > > > string. > > > If it gets modified concurrently, then bad things happen. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Mathieu > > > > > > * chris meyers (chris.meyers.fsu at gmail.com) wrote: > > > > Did this fix solve the multi-threaded test case for you? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Chris > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers < > > > > mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Missing smp_wmb() at subbuffer switch. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > git/ust/libust/buffers.c | 6 +++--- > > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > Index: ust/libust/buffers.c > > > > > =================================================================== > > > > > --- ust/libust/buffers.c 2010-08-10 16:16:39.000000000 -0400 > > > > > +++ ust/libust/buffers.c 2010-08-10 16:19:59.000000000 -0400 > > > > > @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_switch_old_subbu > > > > > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the > IPI > > > > > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > > > > > */ > > > > > - barrier(); > > > > > + smp_wmb(); > > > > > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[oldidx].cc, padding_size); > > > > > commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[oldidx].cc); > > > > > ltt_check_deliver(chan, buf, offsets->old - 1, commit_count, > > > > > oldidx); > > > > > @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_switch_new_subbu > > > > > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the > IPI > > > > > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > > > > > */ > > > > > - barrier(); > > > > > + smp_wmb(); > > > > > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[beginidx].cc, > > > > > ltt_subbuffer_header_size()); > > > > > commit_count = > uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[beginidx].cc); > > > > > /* Check if the written buffer has to be delivered */ > > > > > @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_end_switch_curre > > > > > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the > IPI > > > > > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > > > > > */ > > > > > - barrier(); > > > > > + smp_wmb(); > > > > > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[endidx].cc, padding_size); > > > > > commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[endidx].cc); > > > > > ltt_check_deliver(chan, buf, > > > > > -- > > > > > Mathieu Desnoyers > > > > > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > > > > > EfficiOS Inc. > > > > > http://www.efficios.com > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > ltt-dev mailing list > > > > > ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca > > > > > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Mathieu Desnoyers > > > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > > > EfficiOS Inc. > > > http://www.efficios.com > > > > > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20100812/5d843675/attachment-0003.htm> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] UST synchronization fix 2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers 2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers @ 2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: chris meyers @ 2010-08-12 19:37 UTC (permalink / raw) Awesome! It felt like the marker didn't match up with the data somehow. Thanks for working on this problem! -Chris On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 2:42 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers < mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote: > Oh, Sh*t..... I found the underlying problem. > > in lttv: > ltt/marker.c > > marker_update_fields_offsets() updates the marker info offset value, which > affects the offset for the marker for the whole trace. However, this > information > should stay valid as long as the event is "current" in a given tracefile. > > So the problem we have here is that we have the same marker twice in two > threads, with one tracefile per thread. The offsets gets corrupted by > events > read from the other thread while we have the first thread read traceset > middle > reading the event at the lowest level and the event eventually dispatched > (in > order) to the text dump module. > > I'll look into this and come back with a fix. > > Thanks, > > Mathieu > > * chris meyers (chris.meyers.fsu at gmail.com) wrote: > > I can still invoke the problem with the modified test case that you sent > me. > > It works flawlessly without the sleeps, but when I put the sleeps back > in > > it garbles the output. Did it run OK with the sleeps in for you? > > > > -Chris > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 11:56 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers < > > mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote: > > > > > No. But the test-case was incorrect: the string input was concurrently > > > modified > > > by the 2 threads. I'm preparing modifications to string handling to be > more > > > robust (so the trace does not become unreadable). > > > > > Ahh, my bad. That was a mistake to have the different threads modifying > the > > same string. Thanks for the fixed version. > > > > > > > > In your original problem, did you have another event that was trying to > > > save > > > concurrently modified strings into the trace buffers ? > > > > > No > > > > > > > > It's a 2-pass algo: one pass for strlen, 2nd pass doing a memcpy of the > > > string. > > > If it gets modified concurrently, then bad things happen. > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Mathieu > > > > > > * chris meyers (chris.meyers.fsu at gmail.com) wrote: > > > > Did this fix solve the multi-threaded test case for you? > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Chris > > > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers < > > > > mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Missing smp_wmb() at subbuffer switch. > > > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> > > > > > --- > > > > > git/ust/libust/buffers.c | 6 +++--- > > > > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > > > > > > > > Index: ust/libust/buffers.c > > > > > =================================================================== > > > > > --- ust/libust/buffers.c 2010-08-10 16:16:39.000000000 -0400 > > > > > +++ ust/libust/buffers.c 2010-08-10 16:19:59.000000000 -0400 > > > > > @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_switch_old_subbu > > > > > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the > IPI > > > > > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > > > > > */ > > > > > - barrier(); > > > > > + smp_wmb(); > > > > > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[oldidx].cc, padding_size); > > > > > commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[oldidx].cc); > > > > > ltt_check_deliver(chan, buf, offsets->old - 1, commit_count, > > > > > oldidx); > > > > > @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_switch_new_subbu > > > > > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the > IPI > > > > > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > > > > > */ > > > > > - barrier(); > > > > > + smp_wmb(); > > > > > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[beginidx].cc, > > > > > ltt_subbuffer_header_size()); > > > > > commit_count = > uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[beginidx].cc); > > > > > /* Check if the written buffer has to be delivered */ > > > > > @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_end_switch_curre > > > > > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the > IPI > > > > > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > > > > > */ > > > > > - barrier(); > > > > > + smp_wmb(); > > > > > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[endidx].cc, padding_size); > > > > > commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[endidx].cc); > > > > > ltt_check_deliver(chan, buf, > > > > > -- > > > > > Mathieu Desnoyers > > > > > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > > > > > EfficiOS Inc. > > > > > http://www.efficios.com > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > > ltt-dev mailing list > > > > > ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca > > > > > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > Mathieu Desnoyers > > > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > > > EfficiOS Inc. > > > http://www.efficios.com > > > > > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/ltt-dev/attachments/20100812/5d843675/attachment.htm> ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] UST synchronization fix 2010-08-11 14:13 [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] UST synchronization fix Mathieu Desnoyers [not found] ` <AANLkTikd7wEY7YciqxgzWFbC7wLi1quZpJPhRwr69StT@mail.gmail.com> @ 2010-08-16 4:48 ` Pierre-Marc Fournier 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Pierre-Marc Fournier @ 2010-08-16 4:48 UTC (permalink / raw) Merged, thanks. On 08/11/2010 10:13 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > Missing smp_wmb() at subbuffer switch. > > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Desnoyers<mathieu.desnoyers at efficios.com> > --- > git/ust/libust/buffers.c | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > Index: ust/libust/buffers.c > =================================================================== > --- ust/libust/buffers.c 2010-08-10 16:16:39.000000000 -0400 > +++ ust/libust/buffers.c 2010-08-10 16:19:59.000000000 -0400 > @@ -858,7 +858,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_switch_old_subbu > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the IPI > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > */ > - barrier(); > + smp_wmb(); > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[oldidx].cc, padding_size); > commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[oldidx].cc); > ltt_check_deliver(chan, buf, offsets->old - 1, commit_count, oldidx); > @@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_switch_new_subbu > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the IPI > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > */ > - barrier(); > + smp_wmb(); > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[beginidx].cc, ltt_subbuffer_header_size()); > commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[beginidx].cc); > /* Check if the written buffer has to be delivered */ > @@ -932,7 +932,7 @@ static void ltt_reserve_end_switch_curre > * This compiler barrier is upgraded into a smp_wmb() by the IPI > * sent by get_subbuf() when it does its smp_rmb(). > */ > - barrier(); > + smp_wmb(); > uatomic_add(&buf->commit_count[endidx].cc, padding_size); > commit_count = uatomic_read(&buf->commit_count[endidx].cc); > ltt_check_deliver(chan, buf, ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-08-16 4:48 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2010-08-11 14:13 [ltt-dev] [UST PATCH] UST synchronization fix Mathieu Desnoyers
[not found] ` <AANLkTikd7wEY7YciqxgzWFbC7wLi1quZpJPhRwr69StT@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20100811155627.GA24570@Krystal>
[not found] ` <AANLkTimWD+taSsqrCR+O4gFT=qdPfmYFYgkYohn6pWj+@mail.gmail.com>
2010-08-12 18:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers
2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers
2010-08-12 19:37 ` chris meyers
2010-08-16 4:48 ` Pierre-Marc Fournier
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox