* [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/3] Fix the "unknown" case [not found] ` <1276286430-21147-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> @ 2010-06-13 21:28 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 2010-06-14 0:41 ` Paul E. McKenney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2010-06-13 21:28 UTC (permalink / raw) * Paul E. McKenney (paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > Use a back-to-back pair of pthread_mutex_lock acquisitions and releases > to stand in for a memory barrier, given that ARM doesn't seem to do > the right thing with __sync_synchronize(). Tested on ARM and on x86. > The x86 testing was performed by removing all of the x86-specific > tests from configure.ac and then building from scratch. > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > --- > configure.ac | 9 +--- > urcu/arch_unknown.h | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > urcu/uatomic_arch_unknown.h | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > create mode 100644 urcu/arch_unknown.h > create mode 100644 urcu/uatomic_arch_unknown.h > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > index 1b1ca65..9274337 100644 > --- a/configure.ac > +++ b/configure.ac > @@ -54,13 +54,8 @@ case $host_cpu in > *) ARCHTYPE="unknown";; > esac > > -if test "$ARCHTYPE" != "unknown"; then > - UATOMICSRC=urcu/uatomic_arch_$ARCHTYPE.h > - ARCHSRC=urcu/arch_$ARCHTYPE.h > -else > - UATOMICSRC=urcu/uatomic_generic.h > - ARCHSRC=urcu/arch_generic.h > -fi > +UATOMICSRC=urcu/uatomic_arch_$ARCHTYPE.h > +ARCHSRC=urcu/arch_$ARCHTYPE.h > if test "x$ARCHTYPE" != xx86 -a "x$ARCHTYPE" != xppc; then > APISRC=tests/api_gcc.h > else > diff --git a/urcu/arch_unknown.h b/urcu/arch_unknown.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..3f78310 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/urcu/arch_unknown.h > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ > +#ifndef _URCU_ARCH_ARMV7_H > +#define _URCU_ARCH_ARMV7_H > + > +/* > + * arch_armv7.h: trivial definitions for the ARMv7-A/R architecture. > + * > + * Copyright (c) 2010 Paul E. McKenney, IBM Corporation. > + * Copyright (c) 2009 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at polymtl.ca> > + * > + * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public > + * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either > + * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. > +* > + * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU > + * Lesser General Public License for more details. > + * > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public > + * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software > + * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA > + */ > + > +#include <urcu/compiler.h> > +#include <urcu/config.h> > + > +#ifdef __cplusplus > +extern "C" { > +#endif > + > +/* We don't know, so guess!!! */ > +#define CACHE_LINE_SIZE 64 > + > +#define mb() \ > + do { \ > + pthread_mutex_t __mb_fake_mutex; \ Can you give a hint telling why this double mutex acquire-release produces the equivalent of a memory barrier ? Some comments would be welcome in the code. Commenting that this mutex is declared on the local function stack would be appropriate too (I had my mind in a twist at first thinking it was somehow static). BTW, I don't think it is required to keep the next patch separate. Folding it into this patch will probably make the following discussion easier. Thanks! Mathieu > + \ > + pthread_mutex_init(&__mb_fake_mutex, NULL); \ > + if (pthread_mutex_lock(&__mb_fake_mutex) != 0) { \ > + perror("pthread_mutex_lock"); \ > + abort(); \ > + } \ > + if (pthread_mutex_unlock(&__mb_fake_mutex) != 0) { \ > + perror("pthread_mutex_lock"); \ > + abort(); \ > + } \ > + if (pthread_mutex_lock(&__mb_fake_mutex) != 0) { \ > + perror("pthread_mutex_lock"); \ > + abort(); \ > + } \ > + if (pthread_mutex_unlock(&__mb_fake_mutex) != 0) { \ > + perror("pthread_mutex_lock"); \ > + abort(); \ > + } \ > + } while (0) > + > +/* > + * Serialize core instruction execution. Also acts as a compiler barrier. > + */ > +#define sync_core() asm volatile("isb" : : : "memory") > + > +#include <stdlib.h> > +#include <sys/time.h> > + > +typedef unsigned long long cycles_t; > + > +static inline cycles_t get_cycles (void) > +{ > + long long thetime; > + struct timeval tv; > + > + if (gettimeofday(&tv, NULL) != 0) { > + perror("gettimeofday"); > + abort(); > + } > + thetime = ((long long)tv.tv_sec) * 1000000ULL + ((long long)tv.tv_usec); > + return (cycles_t)thetime; > +} > + > +#ifdef __cplusplus > +} > +#endif > + > +#include <urcu/arch_generic.h> > + > +#endif /* _URCU_ARCH_ARMV7_H */ > diff --git a/urcu/uatomic_arch_unknown.h b/urcu/uatomic_arch_unknown.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..d1cf93e > --- /dev/null > +++ b/urcu/uatomic_arch_unknown.h > @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ > +#ifndef _URCU_ARCH_UATOMIC_ARMV7_H > +#define _URCU_ARCH_UATOMIC_ARMV7_H > + > +/* > + * Copyright (c) 1991-1994 by Xerox Corporation. All rights reserved. > + * Copyright (c) 1996-1999 by Silicon Graphics. All rights reserved. > + * Copyright (c) 1999-2004 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. > + * Copyright (c) 2009 Mathieu Desnoyers > + * Copyright (c) 2010 Paul E. McKenney, IBM Corporation > + * (Adapted from uatomic_arch_ppc.h) > + * > + * THIS MATERIAL IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITH ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED > + * OR IMPLIED. ANY USE IS AT YOUR OWN RISK. > + * > + * Permission is hereby granted to use or copy this program > + * for any purpose, provided the above notices are retained on all copies. > + * Permission to modify the code and to distribute modified code is granted, > + * provided the above notices are retained, and a notice that the code was > + * modified is included with the above copyright notice. > + * > + * Code inspired from libuatomic_ops-1.2, inherited in part from the > + * Boehm-Demers-Weiser conservative garbage collector. > + */ > + > +#include <urcu/compiler.h> > +#include <urcu/system.h> > + > +#ifdef __cplusplus > +extern "C" { > +#endif > + > +#define ILLEGAL_INSTR ".long 0xd00d00" /* @@@FIXME from ppc to ARM. */ > + > +/* > + * Using a isync as second barrier for exchange to provide acquire semantic. > + * According to uatomic_ops/sysdeps/gcc/powerpc.h, the documentation is "fairly > + * explicit that this also has acquire semantics." > + * Derived from AO_compare_and_swap(), but removed the comparison. > + */ > + > +/* xchg */ > +#define uatomic_xchg(addr, v) __sync_lock_test_and_set(addr, v); > + > +/* cmpxchg */ > +#define uatomic_cmpxchg(addr, old, _new) \ > + __sync_val_compare_and_swap(addr, old, _new) > + > +/* uatomic_add_return */ > +#define uatomic_add_return(addr, v) __sync_add_and_fetch(addr, v) > + > +#ifdef __cplusplus > +} > +#endif > + > +#include <urcu/uatomic_generic.h> > + > +#endif /* _URCU_ARCH_UATOMIC_ARMV7_H */ > -- > 1.7.0.6 > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/3] Fix the "unknown" case 2010-06-13 21:28 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/3] Fix the "unknown" case Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2010-06-14 0:41 ` Paul E. McKenney 2010-06-14 16:51 ` Paolo Bonzini 2010-06-14 16:52 ` Paolo Bonzini 0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-06-14 0:41 UTC (permalink / raw) On Sun, Jun 13, 2010 at 05:28:28PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > * Paul E. McKenney (paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > > Use a back-to-back pair of pthread_mutex_lock acquisitions and releases > > to stand in for a memory barrier, given that ARM doesn't seem to do > > the right thing with __sync_synchronize(). Tested on ARM and on x86. > > The x86 testing was performed by removing all of the x86-specific > > tests from configure.ac and then building from scratch. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com> > > --- > > configure.ac | 9 +--- > > urcu/arch_unknown.h | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > urcu/uatomic_arch_unknown.h | 57 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 3 files changed, 146 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) > > create mode 100644 urcu/arch_unknown.h > > create mode 100644 urcu/uatomic_arch_unknown.h > > > > diff --git a/configure.ac b/configure.ac > > index 1b1ca65..9274337 100644 > > --- a/configure.ac > > +++ b/configure.ac > > @@ -54,13 +54,8 @@ case $host_cpu in > > *) ARCHTYPE="unknown";; > > esac > > > > -if test "$ARCHTYPE" != "unknown"; then > > - UATOMICSRC=urcu/uatomic_arch_$ARCHTYPE.h > > - ARCHSRC=urcu/arch_$ARCHTYPE.h > > -else > > - UATOMICSRC=urcu/uatomic_generic.h > > - ARCHSRC=urcu/arch_generic.h > > -fi > > +UATOMICSRC=urcu/uatomic_arch_$ARCHTYPE.h > > +ARCHSRC=urcu/arch_$ARCHTYPE.h > > if test "x$ARCHTYPE" != xx86 -a "x$ARCHTYPE" != xppc; then > > APISRC=tests/api_gcc.h > > else > > diff --git a/urcu/arch_unknown.h b/urcu/arch_unknown.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..3f78310 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/urcu/arch_unknown.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,87 @@ > > +#ifndef _URCU_ARCH_ARMV7_H > > +#define _URCU_ARCH_ARMV7_H > > + > > +/* > > + * arch_armv7.h: trivial definitions for the ARMv7-A/R architecture. > > + * > > + * Copyright (c) 2010 Paul E. McKenney, IBM Corporation. > > + * Copyright (c) 2009 Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers at polymtl.ca> > > + * > > + * This library is free software; you can redistribute it and/or > > + * modify it under the terms of the GNU Lesser General Public > > + * License as published by the Free Software Foundation; either > > + * version 2.1 of the License, or (at your option) any later version. > > +* > > + * This library is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, > > + * but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of > > + * MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU > > + * Lesser General Public License for more details. > > + * > > + * You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public > > + * License along with this library; if not, write to the Free Software > > + * Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA > > + */ > > + > > +#include <urcu/compiler.h> > > +#include <urcu/config.h> > > + > > +#ifdef __cplusplus > > +extern "C" { > > +#endif > > + > > +/* We don't know, so guess!!! */ > > +#define CACHE_LINE_SIZE 64 > > + > > +#define mb() \ > > + do { \ > > + pthread_mutex_t __mb_fake_mutex; \ > > Can you give a hint telling why this double mutex acquire-release produces the > equivalent of a memory barrier ? Some comments would be welcome in the code. > Commenting that this mutex is declared on the local function stack would be > appropriate too (I had my mind in a twist at first thinking it was somehow > static). The compiler (and sometimes the CPU) are within their rights to move code into a lock-based critical section. So if we do only one lock acquisition: do_first_thing(); acquire_lock(); release_lock(); do_second_thing(); could legally be transformed to: acquire_lock(); do_second_thing(); do_first_thing(); release_lock(); which certainly isn't acting like a memory barrier. But with two locks: do_first_thing(); acquire_lock(); release_lock(); acquire_lock(); release_lock(); do_second_thing(); the worst that the compiler and CPU can do is: acquire_lock(); do_first_thing(); release_lock(); acquire_lock(); do_second_thing(); release_lock(); which is still acting like a memory barrier. > BTW, I don't think it is required to keep the next patch separate. Folding it > into this patch will probably make the following discussion easier. Fair enough! But see later comments. Thanx, Paul > Thanks! > > Mathieu > > > + \ > > + pthread_mutex_init(&__mb_fake_mutex, NULL); \ > > + if (pthread_mutex_lock(&__mb_fake_mutex) != 0) { \ > > + perror("pthread_mutex_lock"); \ > > + abort(); \ > > + } \ > > + if (pthread_mutex_unlock(&__mb_fake_mutex) != 0) { \ > > + perror("pthread_mutex_lock"); \ > > + abort(); \ > > + } \ > > + if (pthread_mutex_lock(&__mb_fake_mutex) != 0) { \ > > + perror("pthread_mutex_lock"); \ > > + abort(); \ > > + } \ > > + if (pthread_mutex_unlock(&__mb_fake_mutex) != 0) { \ > > + perror("pthread_mutex_lock"); \ > > + abort(); \ > > + } \ > > + } while (0) > > + > > +/* > > + * Serialize core instruction execution. Also acts as a compiler barrier. > > + */ > > +#define sync_core() asm volatile("isb" : : : "memory") > > + > > +#include <stdlib.h> > > +#include <sys/time.h> > > + > > +typedef unsigned long long cycles_t; > > + > > +static inline cycles_t get_cycles (void) > > +{ > > + long long thetime; > > + struct timeval tv; > > + > > + if (gettimeofday(&tv, NULL) != 0) { > > + perror("gettimeofday"); > > + abort(); > > + } > > + thetime = ((long long)tv.tv_sec) * 1000000ULL + ((long long)tv.tv_usec); > > + return (cycles_t)thetime; > > +} > > + > > +#ifdef __cplusplus > > +} > > +#endif > > + > > +#include <urcu/arch_generic.h> > > + > > +#endif /* _URCU_ARCH_ARMV7_H */ > > diff --git a/urcu/uatomic_arch_unknown.h b/urcu/uatomic_arch_unknown.h > > new file mode 100644 > > index 0000000..d1cf93e > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/urcu/uatomic_arch_unknown.h > > @@ -0,0 +1,57 @@ > > +#ifndef _URCU_ARCH_UATOMIC_ARMV7_H > > +#define _URCU_ARCH_UATOMIC_ARMV7_H > > + > > +/* > > + * Copyright (c) 1991-1994 by Xerox Corporation. All rights reserved. > > + * Copyright (c) 1996-1999 by Silicon Graphics. All rights reserved. > > + * Copyright (c) 1999-2004 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. > > + * Copyright (c) 2009 Mathieu Desnoyers > > + * Copyright (c) 2010 Paul E. McKenney, IBM Corporation > > + * (Adapted from uatomic_arch_ppc.h) > > + * > > + * THIS MATERIAL IS PROVIDED AS IS, WITH ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED > > + * OR IMPLIED. ANY USE IS AT YOUR OWN RISK. > > + * > > + * Permission is hereby granted to use or copy this program > > + * for any purpose, provided the above notices are retained on all copies. > > + * Permission to modify the code and to distribute modified code is granted, > > + * provided the above notices are retained, and a notice that the code was > > + * modified is included with the above copyright notice. > > + * > > + * Code inspired from libuatomic_ops-1.2, inherited in part from the > > + * Boehm-Demers-Weiser conservative garbage collector. > > + */ > > + > > +#include <urcu/compiler.h> > > +#include <urcu/system.h> > > + > > +#ifdef __cplusplus > > +extern "C" { > > +#endif > > + > > +#define ILLEGAL_INSTR ".long 0xd00d00" /* @@@FIXME from ppc to ARM. */ > > + > > +/* > > + * Using a isync as second barrier for exchange to provide acquire semantic. > > + * According to uatomic_ops/sysdeps/gcc/powerpc.h, the documentation is "fairly > > + * explicit that this also has acquire semantics." > > + * Derived from AO_compare_and_swap(), but removed the comparison. > > + */ > > + > > +/* xchg */ > > +#define uatomic_xchg(addr, v) __sync_lock_test_and_set(addr, v); > > + > > +/* cmpxchg */ > > +#define uatomic_cmpxchg(addr, old, _new) \ > > + __sync_val_compare_and_swap(addr, old, _new) > > + > > +/* uatomic_add_return */ > > +#define uatomic_add_return(addr, v) __sync_add_and_fetch(addr, v) > > + > > +#ifdef __cplusplus > > +} > > +#endif > > + > > +#include <urcu/uatomic_generic.h> > > + > > +#endif /* _URCU_ARCH_UATOMIC_ARMV7_H */ > > -- > > 1.7.0.6 > > > > -- > Mathieu Desnoyers > Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant > EfficiOS Inc. > http://www.efficios.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/3] Fix the "unknown" case 2010-06-14 0:41 ` Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-06-14 16:51 ` Paolo Bonzini 2010-06-14 17:05 ` Paul E. McKenney 2010-06-14 16:52 ` Paolo Bonzini 1 sibling, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2010-06-14 16:51 UTC (permalink / raw) On 06/14/2010 02:41 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > The compiler (and sometimes the CPU) are within their rights to move > code into a lock-based critical section. With two > locks: > > do_first_thing(); > acquire_lock(); > release_lock(); > acquire_lock(); > release_lock(); > do_second_thing(); > > the worst that the compiler and CPU can do is: > > acquire_lock(); > do_first_thing(); > release_lock(); > acquire_lock(); > do_second_thing(); > release_lock(); > > which is still acting like a memory barrier. Interesting, so it's actually the release+acquire that is doing the job. I thought about barrier+acquire+release+barrier, but that would placate the compiler only, not the CPU. Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/3] Fix the "unknown" case 2010-06-14 16:51 ` Paolo Bonzini @ 2010-06-14 17:05 ` Paul E. McKenney 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Paul E. McKenney @ 2010-06-14 17:05 UTC (permalink / raw) On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 06:51:30PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > On 06/14/2010 02:41 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > >The compiler (and sometimes the CPU) are within their rights to move > >code into a lock-based critical section. With two > >locks: > > > > do_first_thing(); > > acquire_lock(); > > release_lock(); > > acquire_lock(); > > release_lock(); > > do_second_thing(); > > > >the worst that the compiler and CPU can do is: > > > > acquire_lock(); > > do_first_thing(); > > release_lock(); > > acquire_lock(); > > do_second_thing(); > > release_lock(); > > > >which is still acting like a memory barrier. > > Interesting, so it's actually the release+acquire that is doing the > job. I thought about barrier+acquire+release+barrier, but that > would placate the compiler only, not the CPU. Strange but true! ;-) Thanx, Paul ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/3] Fix the "unknown" case 2010-06-14 0:41 ` Paul E. McKenney 2010-06-14 16:51 ` Paolo Bonzini @ 2010-06-14 16:52 ` Paolo Bonzini 1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Paolo Bonzini @ 2010-06-14 16:52 UTC (permalink / raw) On 06/14/2010 02:41 AM, Paul E. McKenney wrote: > The compiler (and sometimes the CPU) are within their rights to move > code into a lock-based critical section. With two > locks: > > do_first_thing(); > acquire_lock(); > release_lock(); > acquire_lock(); > release_lock(); > do_second_thing(); > > the worst that the compiler and CPU can do is: > > acquire_lock(); > do_first_thing(); > release_lock(); > acquire_lock(); > do_second_thing(); > release_lock(); > > which is still acting like a memory barrier. Interesting, so it's actually the release+acquire that is doing the job. I thought about barrier+acquire+release+barrier, but that would placate the compiler only, not the CPU. Paolo ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
[parent not found: <1276286430-21147-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]
* [ltt-dev] [PATCH 3/3] Remove unused sync_core() definitions [not found] ` <1276286430-21147-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com> @ 2010-06-13 21:30 ` Mathieu Desnoyers 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Mathieu Desnoyers @ 2010-06-13 21:30 UTC (permalink / raw) * Paul E. McKenney (paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote: > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck at linux.vnet.ibm.com> Merged and pushed, thanks ! Mathieu > --- > urcu/arch_generic.h | 4 ---- > urcu/arch_ppc.h | 5 ----- > urcu/arch_x86.h | 14 -------------- > 3 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/urcu/arch_generic.h b/urcu/arch_generic.h > index e9b1b82..0484618 100644 > --- a/urcu/arch_generic.h > +++ b/urcu/arch_generic.h > @@ -121,10 +121,6 @@ extern "C" { > #define cpu_relax() barrier() > #endif > > -#ifndef sync_core > -#define sync_core() mb() > -#endif > - > #ifdef __cplusplus > } > #endif > diff --git a/urcu/arch_ppc.h b/urcu/arch_ppc.h > index eeeb753..185cb22 100644 > --- a/urcu/arch_ppc.h > +++ b/urcu/arch_ppc.h > @@ -34,11 +34,6 @@ extern "C" { > > #define mb() asm volatile("sync":::"memory") > > -/* > - * Serialize core instruction execution. Also acts as a compiler barrier. > - */ > -#define sync_core() asm volatile("isync" : : : "memory") > - > #define mftbl() \ > ({ \ > unsigned long rval; \ > diff --git a/urcu/arch_x86.h b/urcu/arch_x86.h > index 64cc026..e3171a2 100644 > --- a/urcu/arch_x86.h > +++ b/urcu/arch_x86.h > @@ -47,20 +47,6 @@ extern "C" { > > #define cpu_relax() asm volatile("rep; nop" : : : "memory"); > > -/* > - * Serialize core instruction execution. Also acts as a compiler barrier. > - * On PIC ebx cannot be clobbered > - */ > -#ifdef __PIC__ > -#define sync_core() \ > - asm volatile("push %%ebx; cpuid; pop %%ebx" \ > - : : : "memory", "eax", "ecx", "edx"); > -#endif > -#ifndef __PIC__ > -#define sync_core() \ > - asm volatile("cpuid" : : : "memory", "eax", "ebx", "ecx", "edx"); > -#endif > - > #define rdtscll(val) \ > do { \ > unsigned int __a, __d; \ > -- > 1.7.0.6 > -- Mathieu Desnoyers Operating System Efficiency R&D Consultant EfficiOS Inc. http://www.efficios.com ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2010-06-14 17:05 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
[not found] <20100611195937.GA18891@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
[not found] ` <1276286430-21147-1-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2010-06-13 21:28 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 1/3] Fix the "unknown" case Mathieu Desnoyers
2010-06-14 0:41 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-14 16:51 ` Paolo Bonzini
2010-06-14 17:05 ` Paul E. McKenney
2010-06-14 16:52 ` Paolo Bonzini
[not found] ` <1276286430-21147-3-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
2010-06-13 21:30 ` [ltt-dev] [PATCH 3/3] Remove unused sync_core() definitions Mathieu Desnoyers
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox