Mirror of the lttng-dev mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: skrishnakar@gmail.com (srikanth krishnakar)
Subject: [ltt-dev] Compilation error of trace_clock for PowerPC (ppc32)
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2009 18:28:02 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <6213bc560904290558g7c445f5an6e2b857f4d3a1553@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20090429125802.fUNaTQTx2PPHLyY-bXOO1pM3d_A1ER5VRvHfy-9ik00@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090429124206.GA32163@Krystal>

Hi Mathieu,

On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 6:12 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers <
compudj at krystal.dyndns.org> wrote:

> * srikanth krishnakar (skrishnakar at gmail.com) wrote:
> > Hi Mathieu,
> >
> > Testing with latest LTTng verison 2.6.29-lttng-0.122  for kernel
> > linux-2.6.29 gives following compile error for PowerPC architecture :
> >
> > ---------------------------
> > LTTng : 2.6.29-lttng-0.122
> > Kernel : Linux-2.6.29
> > Arch: PPC_32
> > Toolchain: ppc_440
> > ---------------------------
> >
> > In file included from include/linux/trace-clock.h:13,
> >                  from include/linux/ltt-tracer.h:22,
> >                  from kernel/marker.c:29:
> > linux-2.6.29-lttng/arch/powerpc/include/asm/trace-clock.h: In function
> > ?trace_clock_read32?:
> > linux-2.6.29-lttng/arch/powerpc/include/asm/trace-clock.h:18: error:
> > implicit declaration of function ?get_tbl?
> > linux-2.6.29-lttng/arch/powerpc/include/asm/trace-clock.h: In function
> > ?trace_clock_read64?:
> > linux-2.6.29-lttng/arch/powerpc/include/asm/trace-clock.h:23: error:
> > implicit declaration of function ?get_tb?
> > make[1]: *** [kernel/marker.o] Error 1
> > make: *** [kernel] Error 2
> >
> > This error is first seen in :
> >
> > *2.6.29-rc8-lttng-0.112
> >
> > Continues till 2.6.29-lttng-0.122
> > *
> >
> > As per your earlier request I am attaching the default .config used while
> > compilation.
> >
> >
> > Can you please submit a fix for this error ???
> >
>
> Yes, I think I'll need your full .config.
>
> And please try 2.6.29.1-lttng-0.124, just to be sure. I remember doing a
> fix in this area not so long ago, but looking at my current powerpc
> trace-clock.h there seems to be no obvious change since lttng 0.112.


For LTTng 2.6.29-lttng-0.124 I see the same errors as shown below:

In file included from include/linux/trace-clock.h:13,
                 from include/linux/ltt-tracer.h:22,
                 from kernel/marker.c:29:
linux-2.6-lttng/arch/powerpc/include/asm/trace-clock.h: In function
?trace_clock_read32?:
linux-2.6-lttng/arch/powerpc/include/asm/trace-clock.h:18: error: implicit
declaration of function ?get_tbl?
linux-2.6-lttng/arch/powerpc/include/asm/trace-clock.h: In function
?trace_clock_read64?:
linux-2.6-lttng/arch/powerpc/include/asm/trace-clock.h:23: error: implicit
declaration of function ?get_tb?
make[1]: *** [kernel/marker.o] Error 1
make: *** [kernel] Error 2
[root at srikant linux-2.6-lttng]#

Seems still the error exists.

-Srikanth

>
>
> Mathieu
>
> > Regards
> > Srikanth Krishnakar
> > **********************
>
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > ltt-dev mailing list
> > ltt-dev at lists.casi.polymtl.ca
> > http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ltt-dev
>
>
> --
> Mathieu Desnoyers
> OpenPGP key fingerprint: 8CD5 52C3 8E3C 4140 715F  BA06 3F25 A8FE 3BAE 9A68
>



-- 
"The Good You Do, The Best You GET"

Regards
Srikanth Krishnakar
**********************
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.casi.polymtl.ca/pipermail/lttng-dev/attachments/20090429/9a9c8806/attachment-0003.htm>


  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-29 12:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-29  6:39 srikanth krishnakar
2009-04-29  6:39 ` srikanth krishnakar
2009-04-29 12:42 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-29 12:58   ` srikanth krishnakar [this message]
2009-04-29 12:58     ` srikanth krishnakar
2009-04-29 13:30     ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-04-29 13:43     ` srikanth krishnakar
2009-04-29 13:43       ` srikanth krishnakar
2009-04-29 18:45       ` Mathieu Desnoyers

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=6213bc560904290558g7c445f5an6e2b857f4d3a1553@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=skrishnakar@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox