From: jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com (Josh Boyer)
Subject: [ltt-dev] cli/sti vs local_cmpxchg and local_add_return
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 07:56:24 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20090318115624.GF3873@zod.rchland.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090317013220.GA22474@Krystal>
On Mon, Mar 16, 2009 at 09:32:20PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I am trying to get access to some non-x86 hardware to run some atomic
>primitive benchmarks for a paper on LTTng I am preparing. That should be
>useful to argue about performance benefit of per-cpu atomic operations
>vs interrupt disabling. I would like to run the following benchmark
>module on CONFIG_SMP :
>
>- PowerPC
>- MIPS
>- ia64
>- alpha
>
>usage :
>make
>insmod test-cmpxchg-nolock.ko
>insmod: error inserting 'test-cmpxchg-nolock.ko': -1 Resource temporarily unavailable
>dmesg (see dmesg output)
>
>If some of you would be kind enough to run my test module provided below
>and provide the results of these tests on a recent kernel (2.6.26~2.6.29
>should be good) along with their cpuinfo, I would greatly appreciate.
>
>Here are the CAS results for various Intel-based architectures :
>
>Architecture | Speedup | CAS | Interrupts |
> | (cli + sti) / local cmpxchg | local | sync | Enable (sti) | Disable (cli)
>-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>Intel Pentium 4 | 5.24 | 25 | 81 | 70 | 61 |
>AMD Athlon(tm)64 X2 | 4.57 | 7 | 17 | 17 | 15 |
>Intel Core2 | 6.33 | 6 | 30 | 20 | 18 |
>Intel Xeon E5405 | 5.25 | 8 | 24 | 20 | 22 |
I know you have results from a POWER6 machine already, but
here are the results on a dual-G5 running 2.6.29-rc7-git4.
If you are interested, I could get you results from running
this on an embedded PowerPC board.
josh
test init
test results: time for baseline
number of loops: 20000
total time: 1532
-> baseline takes 0 cycles
test end
test results: time for locked cmpxchg
number of loops: 20000
total time: 48052
-> locked cmpxchg takes 2 cycles
test end
test results: time for non locked cmpxchg
number of loops: 20000
total time: 29141
-> non locked cmpxchg takes 1 cycles
test end
test results: time for locked add return
number of loops: 20000
total time: 44985
-> locked add return takes 2 cycles
test end
test results: time for non locked add return
number of loops: 20000
total time: 32400
-> non locked add return takes 1 cycles
test end
test results: time for enabling interrupts (STI)
number of loops: 20000
total time: 65579
-> enabling interrupts (STI) takes 3 cycles
test end
test results: time for disabling interrupts (CLI)
number of loops: 20000
total time: 29135
-> disabling interrupts (CLI) takes 1 cycles
test end
test results: time for disabling/enabling interrupts (STI/CLI)
number of loops: 20000
total time: 173594
-> enabling/disabling interrupts (STI/CLI) takes 8 cycles
test end
[jwboyer at localhost ~]$
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-18 11:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-17 1:32 Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-17 3:37 ` David Miller
2009-03-17 4:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-17 4:27 ` David Miller
2009-03-17 4:44 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-17 5:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-17 16:06 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-17 19:28 ` David Miller
2009-03-17 19:35 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-17 6:05 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-17 15:14 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-18 11:43 ` Nick Piggin
2009-03-18 15:10 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-17 18:42 ` Alan D. Brunelle
2009-03-17 19:01 ` Andika Triwidada
2009-03-23 16:50 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-18 11:56 ` Josh Boyer [this message]
2009-03-23 16:56 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2009-03-23 17:04 ` Josh Boyer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20090318115624.GF3873@zod.rchland.ibm.com \
--to=jwboyer@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox